Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31554909›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Multimodal Hippocampal Subfield Grading For Alzheimer's Disease Classification.

Kilian Hett, Vinh-Thong Ta, Gwenaëlle Catheline, Thomas Tourdias, José V Manjón, Pierrick Coupé, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Protein mishandling and impaired lysosomal proteolysis generated through calcium dysregulation in Alzheimer's disease.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kilian HettUniv. Bordeaux, LaBRI, UMR 5800, PICTURA, F-33400, Talence, France. kilian.hett@u-bordeaux.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8831-4247
Vinh-Thong TaUniv. Bordeaux, LaBRI, UMR 5800, PICTURA, F-33400, Talence, France.
Gwenaëlle CathelineUniv. Bordeaux, INCIA, UMR 5287, F-33400, Talence, France.
Thomas TourdiasCHU de Bordeaux, Service de neuroimagerie diagnostique et thérapeutique, F-33076, Bordeaux, France.
José V ManjónUniversitat Politècnica de València, ITACA, 46022, Valencia, Spain.
Pierrick CoupéUniv. Bordeaux, LaBRI, UMR 5800, PICTURA, F-33400, Talence, France.
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous studies have proposed biomarkers based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to detect and predict the risk of evolution toward Alzheimer's disease (AD). Most of these methods have focused on the hippocampus, which is known to be one of the earliest structures impacted by the disease. To date, patch-based grading approaches provide among the best biomarkers based on the hippocampus. However, this structure is complex and is divided into different subfields, not equally impacted by AD. Former in-vivo imaging studies mainly investigated structural alterations of these subfields using volumetric measurements and microstructural modifications with mean diffusivity measurements. The aim of our work is to improve the current classification performances based on the hippocampus with a new multimodal patch-based framework combining structural and diffusivity MRI. The combination of these two MRI modalities enables the capture of subtle structural and microstructural alterations. Moreover, we propose to study the efficiency of this new framework applied to the hippocampal subfields. To this end, we compare the classification accuracy provided by the different hippocampal subfields using volume, mean diffusivity, and our novel multimodal patch-based grading framework combining structural and diffusion MRI. The experiments conducted in this work show that our new multimodal patch-based method applied to the whole hippocampus provides the most discriminating biomarker for advanced AD detection while our new framework applied into subiculum obtains the best results for AD prediction, improving by two percentage points the accuracy compared to the whole hippocampus.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleHippocampusHumansMaleMultimodal ImagingRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID31554909
PMCPMC6761169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.