Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31554883›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Inhibition of the right dlPFC by theta burst stimulation does not alter sustainable decision-making.

Benedikt P Langenbach, Thomas Baumgartner, Dario Cazzoli, René M Müri, Daria Knoch

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07133529 (Decision-making and Food Intake), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07133529 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Decision-making and Food Intake ("Buffet Study")

TypeinterventionalSponsorGerman Institute of Human NutritionRan2025 to 2026Enrolled45ConditionsBehavior, Hormones, Stress, CognitionArmsPerceived food uncertainty, Perceived food certainty
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Benedikt P LangenbachUniversity of Bern, Institute of Psychology, Department of Social Psychology and Social Neuroscience, Fabrikstrasse 8, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4873-1569
Thomas BaumgartnerUniversity of Bern, Institute of Psychology, Department of Social Psychology and Social Neuroscience, Fabrikstrasse 8, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5966-7377
Dario CazzoliUniversity Hospital Bern, Department of Neurology, University Neurorehabilitation, Freiburgstrasse 10, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7217-7153
René M MüriUniversity Hospital Bern, Department of Neurology, University Neurorehabilitation, Freiburgstrasse 10, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6990-4188
Daria KnochUniversity of Bern, Institute of Psychology, Department of Social Psychology and Social Neuroscience, Fabrikstrasse 8, 3012, Bern, Switzerland. daria.knoch@psy.unibe.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1935-053X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intergenerational sustainability is probably humankind's most pressing challenge, exacerbated by the fact that the present generation has to incur costs in order to benefit future generations. However, people often fail to restrict their consumption, despite reporting strong pro-environmental attitudes. Recent theorising sees self-control processes as key component of sustainable decision-making and correlational studies support this view, yet causal evidence is lacking. Using TMS, we here disrupted an area known to be involved in self-control processes, the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC), to provide causal evidence as to whether diminished self-control leads to less intergenerational sustainability. Participants then engaged in a behavioural economic paradigm to measure sustainable decision-making towards the next generation. This adequately powered study could not find an effect of inhibiting the right dlPFC on intergenerational sustainability. This result holds when controlling for a number of relevant covariates like gender, trait self-control, pro-environmental attitudes, or cortical thickness at the stimulation site. We seek to explain this result methodologically and theoretically, and speculate about other brain areas that could be more strongly related to intergenerational sustainability, e.g. the mentalising network.

Indexed as

Transcranial Magnetic StimulationDecision MakingEconomics, BehavioralFemaleHumansMalePrefrontal CortexSocial BehaviorTheta RhythmYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31554883
PMCPMC6761266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.