Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31554722›Full record

ArticlemSphere2019

Unknown Risk on the Farm: Does Agricultural Use of Ionophores Contribute to the Burden of Antimicrobial Resistance?

Alex Wong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSphere, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Mechanistic basis for potassium efflux-driven activation of the human NLRP1 inflammasome.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Antimicrobial Resistance inMicrobiology spectrum · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Surveillance of Antibiotic Resistance of Maltose-NegativeAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alex WongDepartment of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada alex.wong@carleton.ca.
Carleton University · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ionophores are the second most widely used class of antibiotic in agriculture, with over 4 million kilograms sold in the United States in 2016. Because ionophores are not used in humans, it is widely assumed that their agricultural use will not impact human health. Consequently, these drugs have not been subject to the same regulations as medically important antibiotics. Here, I argue that the current evidence base is insufficient to conclude that ionophores do not contribute to human relevant antimicrobial resistance. It is unclear whether ionophore resistance can result in cross-resistance to medically important antibiotics. Moreover, recent evidence suggests that ionophore use may coselect for resistance to vancomycin in some cases. Systematic investigation of the consequences of agricultural ionophore use for human health is therefore imperative.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAgricultureAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsFarmsHumansIonophoresAnti-Bacterial AgentsIonophoresagriculturecoselectioncross-resistanceionophoremonensinveterinary microbiology

Identifiers

PMID31554722
PMCPMC6763768
OpenAlexW2976837560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.