Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31554531›Full record

ArticleParasitology2019

Soanandrasana Rahelinirina, Mark H Moseley, Kathryn J Allan, Emmanuel Ramanohizakandrainy, Sati Ravaoarinoro, Minoarisoa Rajerison, Vincent Rakotoharinome, Sandra Telfer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Detection and Characterization ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Soanandrasana RahelinirinaPlague Unit, Institut Pasteur de Madagascar, 101 Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Mark H MoseleySchool of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB24 2TZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0807-4632
Kathryn J AllanInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, University Avenue, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.
Emmanuel RamanohizakandrainyUniversity of Antananarivo, BP 566, Ankatso, 101 Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Sati RavaoarinoroUniversity of Antananarivo, BP 566, Ankatso, 101 Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Minoarisoa RajerisonPlague Unit, Institut Pasteur de Madagascar, 101 Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Vincent RakotoharinomeMinistere de l'Agriculture et de l'Elevage, BP 1453, Analakely, Antananarivo, Madagascar.
Sandra TelferSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB24 2TZ, UK.
Institut Pasteur de Madagascar · MGUniversity of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Antananarivo · MGCentre National de la Recherche Appliquée au Developpement Rural · MGUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M010996/1Wellcome Trust 095171Wellcome Trust 096400Wellcome Trust 2014815/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In developing countries, estimates of the prevalence and diversity of Leptospira infections in livestock, an important but neglected zoonotic pathogen and cause of livestock productivity loss, are lacking. In Madagascar, abattoir sampling of cattle and pigs demonstrated a prevalence of infection of 20% in cattle and 5% in pigs by real-time PCR. In cattle, amplification and sequencing of the Leptospira-specific lfb1 gene revealed novel genotypes, mixed infections of two or more Leptospira species and evidence for potential transmission between small mammals and cattle. Sequencing of the secY gene demonstrated genetic similarities between Leptospira detected in Madagascar and, as yet, uncultured Leptospira strains identified in Tanzania, Reunion and Brazil. Detection of Leptospira DNA in the same animal was more likely in urine samples or pooled samples from four kidney lobes relative to samples collected from a single kidney lobe, suggesting an effect of sampling method on detection. In pigs, no molecular typing of positive samples was possible. Further research into the epidemiology of livestock leptospirosis in developing countries is needed to inform efforts to reduce human infections and to improve livestock productivity.

Indexed as

AbattoirsAfricaAnimalsCattleCattle DiseasesCoinfectionDeveloping CountriesDisease ReservoirsGenotypeLeptospiraLeptospirosisLivestockMadagascarPhylogenyPrevalenceSwineAfricaMadagascarpathogenspilloverspirochaeteTanzaniaveterinaryzoonosis

Identifiers

PMID31554531
PMCPMC6935375
OpenAlexW2975749211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.