Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31554462›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2019

Intensity of Lipid Lowering With Statin Therapy in Patients With Cerebrovascular Disease Versus Coronary Artery Disease: Insights from the PALM Registry.

Ying Xian, Ann Marie Navar, Shuang Li, Zhuokai Li, Jennifer Robinson, Salim S Virani, Michael J Louie, Andrew Koren, Anne Goldberg, Veronique L Roger and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Ying XianDuke Clinical Research Institute Duke University Medical Center Durham NC.
Ann Marie NavarDuke Clinical Research Institute Duke University Medical Center Durham NC.
Shuang LiDuke Clinical Research Institute Duke University Medical Center Durham NC.
Zhuokai LiDuke Clinical Research Institute Duke University Medical Center Durham NC.
Jennifer RobinsonUniversity of Iowa Iowa City IA.
Salim S ViraniVA Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine Houston TX.
Michael J LouieRegeneron Pharmaceuticals Tarrytown NY.
Andrew KorenSanofi Pharmaceuticals Bridgewater NJ.
Anne GoldbergWashington University St. Louis MO.
Veronique L RogerMayo Clinic Rochester MN.
Peter W F WilsonEmory University Atlanta GA.
Eric D PetersonDuke Clinical Research Institute Duke University Medical Center Durham NC.
Tracy Y WangDuke Clinical Research Institute Duke University Medical Center Durham NC.
Clinical Research Institute · USDuke Medical Center · USBaylor College of Medicine · USEmory University · USRegeneron (United States) · USSanofi (France) · FRUniversity of Iowa · USWinnMed · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Current treatment guidelines strongly recommend statin therapy for secondary prevention. However, it remains unclear whether patients' perceptions of cardiovascular risk, beliefs on cholesterol, or the intensity of prescribed statin therapy differs for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) versus cerebrovascular disease (CeVD) versus both CAD and CeVD (CAD&CeVD). Methods and Results The PALM (Patient and Provider Assessment of Lipid Management) registry collected data on statin use, intensity, and core laboratory low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels for 3232 secondary prevention patients treated at 133 US clinics. Among individuals with CeVD only (n=403), CAD only (n=2202), and CeVD&CAD (n=627), no significant differences were observed in patient-perceived cardiovascular disease risk, beliefs on cholesterol lowering, or perceived effectiveness and safety of statin therapy. However, patients with CeVD only were less likely to receive any statin therapy (76.2% versus 86.2%; adjusted odds ratio 0.64, 95% CI 0.45-0.91), or guideline-recommended statin intensity (34.6% versus 50.4%; adjusted odds ratio 0.60, 95% CI 0.45-0.81) than those with CAD only. Individuals with CeVD only were also less likely to achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <100 mg/dL (59.2% versus 69.7%; adjusted odds ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.99) than individuals with CAD alone. There were no significant differences in the use of any statin therapy or guideline-recommended statin intensity between individuals with CAD&CeVD and those with CAD only. Conclusions Despite lack of significant differences in patient-perceived cardiovascular risk or statin beliefs, patients with CeVD were significantly less likely to receive higher intensity statin or achieve low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <100 mg/dL than those with CAD only.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkersCerebrovascular DisordersCholesterol, LDLCoronary Artery DiseaseDown-RegulationDrug UtilizationDyslipidemiasFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMaleMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'Quality Indicators, Health CareRegistriesBiomarkersCholesterol, LDLHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitorscoronary artery diseasequality of caresecondary preventionstatinstroke

Identifiers

PMID31554462
PMCPMC6806030
OpenAlexW2977064515

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.