Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31554397›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2019

Probing the Conformational and Energy Landscapes of KRAS Membrane Orientation.

Priyanka Prakash, Alemayehu A Gorfe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Decrypting Allostery in Membrane-Bound K-Ras4B Using ComplementaryJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Revealing KRas4b topology on the membrane surface.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Priyanka PrakashMcGovern Medical School , University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston , Department of Integrative Biology and Pharmacology , 6431 Fannin Street , Houston , Texas 77030 , United States.
Alemayehu A GorfeMcGovern Medical School , University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston , Department of Integrative Biology and Pharmacology , 6431 Fannin Street , Houston , Texas 77030 , United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9328-4692

Funding

Breakthrough Molecular Dynamics Research via an Anton2 SupercomputerR01GM116961 · NIGMS · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI BLOOD, PHILIP D. · 2016 to 2023
$3.0M
Decoding the structures and lipid binding specificity of small GTPase membrane anchorsR01GM124233 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI GORFE, ALEMAYEHU A., HANCOCK, JOHN F · 2018 to 2021
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM116961NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Membrane reorientation of oncogenic RAS proteins is emerging as an important modulator of their functions. Previous studies have shown that the most common orientations include those with either the three C-terminal α-helices (OS1) or N-terminal β-strands (OS2) of the catalytic domain facing the membrane. OS1 and OS2 differ by the degree to which the effector-interacting surface is occluded by the membrane. However, the relative stability of these states and the rates of transition between them remained undetermined. How mutations might modulate preferences for specific orientation states is also far from clear. The current work attempted to address these questions through a comprehensive analysis of two 20 μs-long atomistic molecular dynamics simulations. The simulations were conducted on the oncogenic G12D and Q61H KRAS mutants bound to an anionic lipid bilayer. G12D and Q61H are among the most prevalent cancer-causing mutations at the P-loop and switch 2 regions of KRAS, respectively. We found that both mutants fluctuate in a similar manner between OS1 and OS2 via an intermediate orientation OS0, and both favor the signaling competent OS1 and OS0 over the occluded OS2. However, they differ in the details, such as in the extent to which they sample OS1. Analysis of the orientation free-energy landscapes estimated from the simulations indicate that OS1 and OS2 are the most stable states. However, the overall free energy surface is rugged, indicating a large diversity of conformations including at least two substates in each orientation state that differ in stability only by about 0.5-1.0 kcal/mol. Reversible transitions between OS1 and OS2 occur via two well-defined pathways that traverse OS0. In the minimum energy path, helix 4 remains close to the membrane as the angle of the catalytic domain from the membrane plane changes, resulting in a barrier of ∼1 kcal/mol for OS1/OS2 interconversions. Estimation of the rates of the various transitions based on survival probabilities yielded two rate constants in the order of 10

Indexed as

MutationProtein ConformationCatalytic DomainCell MembraneHumansLipid BilayersMolecular Dynamics SimulationProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)KRAS protein, humanLipid BilayersProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)

Identifiers

PMID31554397
PMCPMC7045699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.