Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31554353›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2019

Make Intelligent of Gastric Cancer Diagnosis Error in Qazvin's Medical Centers: Using Data Mining Method.

Asghar Mortezagholi, Omid Khosravizadeh, Mohammad Bagher Menhaj, Younes Shafigh, Rohollah Kalhor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Asghar MortezagholiDepartment of Computer Engineering, Islamic Azad University of Qazvin (QIAU), Qazvin, Iran.
Omid KhosravizadehSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran. Email:r.kalhor@gmail.comORCID 0000-0001-6893-3489
Mohammad Bagher MenhajDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Younes ShafighGeneral Surgeon, Assistant Professor. School of Medicine, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Rohollah KalhorSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran. Email:r.kalhor@gmail.comORCID 0000-0002-6146-8761

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Gastric cancer is one of the most common types of cancers, which will result in irreparable harm in the case of misdiagnosis or late diagnosis. The purpose of this study is to investigate the capability of data mining techniques and disease risk factor characteristics to predict and diagnose the gastric cancer. Methods: In this retrospective descriptive-analytic study, we selected 405 samples from two groups of patient and healthy participants. A total of 11 characteristics and risk factors were examined. we used four Machine learning methods, Include support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), naive Bayesian model, and k nearest neighborhood (KNN) to classify the patients with gastric cancer. The evaluation criteria to investigate the model on the database of patients with gastric cancer included Recall, Precision, F-score, and Accuracy. Data was analyzed using MATLAB® software, version 3.2 (Mathworks Inc., Natick, MA, USA). Results: Based on the results achieved from the evaluation of four methods, the accuracy rates of SVM, DT, naive Bayesian model, and KNN algorithms were 90.08, 87.89, 87.60, and 87.60 percent, respectively. The findings showed that the highest level of F-Score was related to the SVM (91.99); whereas, the lowest rate was associated with the KNN algorithm (87.17). Conclusion: According to the findings, the SVM algorithm showed the best results in classification of Test samples. So, this intelligent system can be used as a physician assistant in medical education hospitals, where the diagnosis processes are performed by medical students.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceBayes TheoremDatabases, FactualData MiningDiagnostic ErrorsHumansIranMachine LearningPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSoftwareStomach NeoplasmsSupport Vector MachineArtificial intelligenceData miningEarly DiagnosisGastric cancerrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID31554353
PMCPMC6976843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.