Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31554254›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Development of 18 Quality Control Gates for Additive Manufacturing of Error Free Patient-Specific Implants.

Daniel Martinez-Marquez, Milda Jokymaityte, Ali Mirnajafizadeh, Christopher P Carty, David Lloyd, Rodney A Stewart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. A review of 3D printed medical implant design.3D printing in medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Integration of Three-dimensional Technologies in Orthopedics: A Tool for Preoperative Planning of Tibial Plateau Fractures.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel Martinez-MarquezSchool of Engineering, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia. daniel.martinezmarquez@griffithuni.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-7326-1015
Milda JokymaityteOrtho Baltic, Kaunas 51124, Lithuania. milda.jokymaityte@orthobaltic.lt.ORCID 0000-0003-4844-0788
Ali MirnajafizadehMolecular Cell Biomechanics Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. ali.mirnajafi@gmail.com.
Christopher P CartySchool of Allied Health Sciences and Gold Coast Orthopaedic Research and Education Alliance, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia. c.carty@griffith.edu.au.
David LloydSchool of Allied Health Sciences and Gold Coast Orthopaedic Research and Education Alliance, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia. david.lloyd@griffith.edu.au.
Rodney A StewartSchool of Engineering, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia. r.stewart@griffith.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-6013-3505

Funding

Advance Queensland Mid-Career Fellowship Queensland GovernmentGriffith University International Postgraduate Award (GUIPA) Griffith University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlike subtractive manufacturing technologies, additive manufacturing (AM) can fabricate complex shapes from the macro to the micro scale, thereby allowing the design of patient-specific implants following a biomimetic approach for the reconstruction of complex bone configurations. Nevertheless, factors such as high design variability and changeable customer needs are re-shaping current medical standards and quality control strategies in this sector. Such factors necessitate the urgent formulation of comprehensive AM quality control procedures. To address this need, this study explored and reported on a variety of aspects related to the production and the quality control of additively manufactured patient-specific implants in three different AM companies. The research goal was to develop an integrated quality control procedure based on the synthesis and the adaptation of the best quality control practices with the three examined companies and/or reported in literature. The study resulted in the development of an integrated quality control procedure consisting of 18 distinct gates based on the best identified industry practices and reported literature such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guideline for AM medical devices and American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards, to name a few. This integrated quality control procedure for patient-specific implants seeks to prepare the AM industry for the inevitable future tightening in related medical regulations. Moreover, this study revealed some critical success factors for companies developing additively manufactured patient-specific implants, including ongoing research and development (R&D) investment, investment in advanced technologies for controlling quality, and fostering a quality improvement organizational culture.

Indexed as

3D printingadditive manufacturingpatient-specific implantsquality controlregulations and standards

Identifiers

PMID31554254
PMCPMC6803939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.