Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31553900›Full record

ArticleCell reports2019

Conformational Sensors and Domain Swapping Reveal Structural and Functional Differences between β-Arrestin Isoforms.

Eshan Ghosh, Hemlata Dwivedi, Mithu Baidya, Ashish Srivastava, Punita Kumari, Tomek Stepniewski, Hee Ryung Kim, Mi-Hye Lee, Jaana van Gastel, Madhu Chaturvedi and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A community Biased Signaling Atlas.Nature chemical biology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. G protein-coupled receptor signaling: transducers and effectors.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.

Eshan GhoshDepartment of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 208016, India.
Hemlata DwivediDepartment of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 208016, India.
Mithu BaidyaDepartment of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 208016, India.
Ashish SrivastavaDepartment of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 208016, India.
Punita KumariDepartment of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 208016, India.
Tomek StepniewskiResearch Programme on Biomedical Informatics (GRIB), Department of Experimental and Health Sciences of Pompeu Fabra University (UPF)-Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), 08003 Barcelona, Spain.
Hee Ryung KimSchool of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, 2066 Seobu-ro, Jangan-gu, Suwon 16419, South Korea.
Mi-Hye LeeDepartment of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
Jaana van GastelTranslational Neurobiology Group, Center of Molecular Neurology, VIB, Antwerp, Belgium; Receptor Biology Lab, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Madhu ChaturvediDepartment of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 208016, India.
Debarati RoyDepartment of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 208016, India.
Shubhi PandeyDepartment of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 208016, India.
Jagannath MaharanaDepartment of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 208016, India.
Ramon Guixà-GonzálezLaboratory of Computational Medicine, Biostatistics Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.
Louis M LuttrellDepartment of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA; Research Service of the Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC 29401, USA.
Ka Young ChungSchool of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, 2066 Seobu-ro, Jangan-gu, Suwon 16419, South Korea.
Somnath DuttaMolecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Jana SelentResearch Programme on Biomedical Informatics (GRIB), Department of Experimental and Health Sciences of Pompeu Fabra University (UPF)-Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), 08003 Barcelona, Spain.
Arun K ShuklaDepartment of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 208016, India. Electronic address: arshukla@iitk.ac.in.
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur · INMedical University of South Carolina · USSungkyunkwan University · KRHospital del Mar Research Institute · ESIndian Academy of Sciences · INPompeu Fabra University · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Antwerp · BE

Funding

Pharmacodynamics of Biased G Protein-Coupled Receptor AgonismR35GM126955 · NIGMS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI LUTTRELL, LOUIS M · 2018 to 2020
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM126955Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Desensitization, signaling, and trafficking of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are critically regulated by multifunctional adaptor proteins, β-arrestins (βarrs). The two isoforms of βarrs (βarr1 and 2) share a high degree of sequence and structural similarity; still, however, they often mediate distinct functional outcomes in the context of GPCR signaling and regulation. A mechanistic basis for such a functional divergence of βarr isoforms is still lacking. By using a set of complementary approaches, including antibody-fragment-based conformational sensors, we discover structural differences between βarr1 and 2 upon their interaction with activated and phosphorylated receptors. Interestingly, domain-swapped chimeras of βarrs display robust complementation in functional assays, thereby linking the structural differences between receptor-bound βarr1 and 2 with their divergent functional outcomes. Our findings reveal important insights into the ability of βarr isoforms to drive distinct functional outcomes and underscore the importance of integrating this aspect in the current framework of biased agonism.

Indexed as

beta-ArrestinsHEK293 CellsHumansMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein DomainsProtein IsoformsSequence Homology, Amino AcidSignal Transductionbeta-ArrestinsProtein Isoformsantibody fragmentsbiased agonismbiosensorscellular signalingdesensitizationelectron microscopyGPCRsnegative stainingβ-arrestins

Identifiers

PMID31553900
PMCPMC7099875
OpenAlexW2976162059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.