Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31553769›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

European public perceptions of homelessness: A knowledge, attitudes and practices survey.

Junie Petit, Sandrine Loubiere, Aurlie Tinland, Maria Vargas-Moniz, Freek Spinnewijn, Rachel Manning, Massimo Santinello, Judith Wolf, Anna Bokszczanin, Roberto Bernad and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Assessing the Impact of a Community-Based Narrative Film about Diabetes and Homelessness.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2025
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Junie PetitAix-Marseille University, School of Medicine-La Timone Medical Campus, CEReSS-Health Service Research and Quality of Life Center, Boulevard Jean Moulin, Marseille, France.
Sandrine LoubiereAix-Marseille University, School of Medicine-La Timone Medical Campus, CEReSS-Health Service Research and Quality of Life Center, Boulevard Jean Moulin, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6715-1223
Aurlie TinlandAix-Marseille University, School of Medicine-La Timone Medical Campus, CEReSS-Health Service Research and Quality of Life Center, Boulevard Jean Moulin, Marseille, France.
Maria Vargas-MonizAPPsyCI (Applied Psychology Research Center: Capabilities and Inclusion), ISPA-Instituto Universitário, Rua Jardim do Tabaco, Lisbon, Portugal.
Freek SpinnewijnFEANTSA, European Federation of National Organisations Working with the Homeless, Chaussée de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Rachel ManningDepartment of Psychology, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-2254-1484
Massimo SantinelloDepartment of Developmental and Social Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia, Padova, Italy.
Judith WolfRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Impuls-Netherlands Center for Social Care Research, Geert Grooteplein, EZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Anna BokszczaninInstitute of Psychology, Opole University, Pl. Staszica, Opole, Poland.
Roberto BernadRais Fundación, C/ Ardemans, Madrid, Spain.
Hakan KallmenSTAD, Stockholm Center for Psychiatry Research and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Norra Stati Onsgatan, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jose OrnelasAPPsyCI (Applied Psychology Research Center: Capabilities and Inclusion), ISPA-Instituto Universitário, Rua Jardim do Tabaco, Lisbon, Portugal.
Pascal AuquierAix-Marseille University, School of Medicine-La Timone Medical Campus, CEReSS-Health Service Research and Quality of Life Center, Boulevard Jean Moulin, Marseille, France.
HOME-EU consortium study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAddressing Citizen's perspectives on homelessness is crucial for the design of effective and durable policy responses, and available research in Europe is not yet substantive. We aim to explore citizens' opinions about homelessness and to explain the differences in attitudes within the general population of eight European countries: France, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Spain, and Sweden.

methodsA nationally representative telephone survey of European citizens was conducted in 2017. Three domains were investigated: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices about homelessness. Based on a multiple correspondence analysis (MCA), a generalized linear model for clustered and weighted samples was used to probe the associations between groups with opposing attitudes.

resultsResponse rates ranged from 30.4% to 33.5% (N = 5,295). Most respondents (57%) had poor knowledge about homelessness. Respondents who thought the government spent too much on homelessness, people who are homeless should be responsible for housing, people remain homeless by choice, or homelessness keeps capabilities/empowerment intact (regarding meals, family contact, and access to work) clustered together (negative attitudes, 30%). Respondents who were willing to pay taxes, welcomed a shelter, or acknowledged people who are homeless may lack some capabilities (i.e. agreed on discrimination in hiring) made another cluster (positive attitudes, 58%). Respondents living in semi-urban or urban areas (ORs 1.33 and 1.34) and those engaged in practices to support people who are homeless (ORs > 1.4; p<0.005) were more likely to report positive attitudes, whereas those from France and Poland (p<0.001) were less likely to report positive attitudes.

conclusionThe majority of European citizens hold positive attitudes towards people who are homeless, however there remain significant differences between and within countries. Although it is clear that there is strong support for increased government action and more effective solutions for Europe's growing homelessness crisis, there also remain public opinion barriers rooted in enduring negative perceptions.

Indexed as

Ill-Housed PersonsPublic OpinionAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEuropeFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31553769
PMCPMC6760760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.