Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31553639›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2019

Treatment of Childhood Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma With Induction Chemotherapy and Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: Results of the Children's Oncology Group ARAR0331 Study.

Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo, Mark D Krailo, Matthew J Krasin, Li Huang, M Beth McCarville, John Hicks, Farzana Pashankar, Alberto S Pappo

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. [Nasopharyngeal carcinoma in children: clinical analysis of 6 cases and literature review].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Carlos Rodriguez-GalindoSt Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Mark D KrailoChildren's Oncology Group, Monrovia, CA.
Matthew J KrasinSt Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
Li HuangChildren's Oncology Group, Monrovia, CA.
M Beth McCarvilleSt Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.
John HicksTexas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX.
Farzana PashankarYale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Alberto S PappoSt Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN.

Funding

NCTN BIQSFP ANBL1531 (NRT)U10CA180886 · NCI · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI Douglas S. Hawkins · 2014 to 2026
$390.6M
COG FOREIGN ACCRUALU10CA098543 · NCI · NATIONAL CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION · PI ADAMSON, PETER C. · 2003 to 2013
$335.5M
COG SDMC - Statistics CoreU10CA180899 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TODD A ALONZO · 2014 to 2026
$132.8M
Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Children's Oncology Group Statistics &Data Center GrantU10CA098413 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI DEVIDAS, MEENAKSHI · 2003 to 2013
$67.5M
QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW CENTER (QARC)U10CA029511 · NCI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI FITZGERALD, THOMAS J. · 1985 to 2013
$23.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS U10 CA029511NCI NIH HHS U10 CA098413NCI NIH HHS U10 CA098543NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180886NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe treatment of childhood nasopharyngeal carcinoma has been adapted from adult regimens; pediatric-specific studies are limited. The ARAR0331 study sought to evaluate the impact of induction chemotherapy (IC) and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCR). PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stages IIb to IV were scheduled to receive three cycles of IC with cisplatin and fluorouracil, followed by CCR with three cycles of cisplatin. Patients with complete or partial response to IC received 61.2 Gy to the nasopharynx and neck, and patients with stable disease received 71.2 Gy.

resultsBetween February 2006 and January 2012, 111 patients (75 male) were enrolled. Median age was 15 years, and 46.8% of the patients were African American. After a feasibility analysis, the study was amended to reduce cisplatin to two cycles during CCR. The 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival estimates were 84.3% and 89.2%, respectively. The 5-year EFS for stages IIb, III, and IV were 100%, 82.8%, and 82.7%, respectively. The 5-year cumulative incidence estimates of local, distant, and combined relapse were 3.7%, 8.7%, and 1.8%, respectively. Patients treated with three versus two CCR cycles of cisplatin had improved 5-year postinduction EFS (90.7%

conclusionPatients in ARAR0331 were characterized by advanced disease and by a high proportion of black children and adolescents. Treatment with IC and CRT resulted in excellent outcomes. A radiation dose reduction is possible for patients responding to IC. Although the outcomes are comparable, we observed a trend toward decreased EFS for patients assigned to receive fewer doses of cisplatin during CCR.

Indexed as

AdolescentAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemoradiotherapyChildChild, PreschoolCisplatinFeasibility StudiesFemaleFluorouracilFollow-Up StudiesHumansInduction ChemotherapyMaleNasopharyngeal CarcinomaNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalCisplatinFluorouracil

Identifiers

PMID31553639
PMCPMC6920031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.