Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31553457›Full record

Trial reportPain medicine (Malden, Mass.)2020

Human Abuse Potential of Oral NKTR-181 in Recreational Opioid Users: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Study.

Xue Ge, Jack E Henningfield, Suresh Siddhanti, Janet Jobes, Lin Lu, Sunny Xie, Margaret Ziola, Debra Kelsh, Bradley Vince, Carlo J Di Fonzo and 5 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Xue GeNektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, California.
Jack E HenningfieldThe Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baltimore, Maryland.
Suresh SiddhantiNektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, California.
Janet JobesNektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, California.
Lin LuNektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, California.
Sunny XieNektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, California.
Margaret ZiolaNektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, California.
Debra KelshAltasciences Clinical Research, Overland Park, Kansas, USA.
Bradley VinceAltasciences Clinical Research, Overland Park, Kansas, USA.
Carlo J Di FonzoNektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, California.
Mary TagliaferriNektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, California.
Jonathan ZalevskyNektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, California.
Stephen K DobersteinNektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, California.
Ute HochNektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, California.
Michael A EldonNektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the human abuse potential, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of oral NKTR-181 (oxycodegol), a novel full mu-opioid receptor agonist, relative to oral oxycodone.

designThis double-blind, randomized, single-dose, crossover human abuse potential study was conducted in healthy, adult, non-physically dependent recreational opioid users.

settingInpatient clinical research site. SUBJECTS: Seventy-one subjects randomized (95.7% male, 65.2% African American, mean age = 31.7 years).

methodsThe primary objective was to compare two therapeutic doses of NKTR-181 (400 and 600 mg) with 40 and 60 mg of oxycodone and a supratherapeutic dose (1200 mg) of NKTR-181 with 60 mg of oxycodone using visual analog scale (VAS) ratings for Drug Liking "at this moment" (Drug Liking). Secondary objectives included VAS ratings for other subjective measures, and central nervous system (CNS) mu-opioid effects were assessed using pupillometry. Each subject received single oral doses of five treatments and matching placebo.

resultsCompared with 40 and 60 mg of oxycodone, the maximum mean Drug Liking score at 400 and 600 mg NKTR-181 was significantly lower, and the rate of onset and extent of Drug Liking for all NKTR-181 doses in the first two hours postdose were also significantly lower. Delayed attenuated Drug Liking and pupillary miosis response following administration of NKTR-181 vs oxycodone were consistent with slower NKTR-181 CNS entry kinetics and mu-opioid receptor binding. No adverse events were rated as severe, and somnolence and dizziness occurred more frequently when subjects received oxycodone.

conclusionsNKTR-181 at oral doses of 400 and 600 mg showed significantly fewer and less severe subjective effects accepted as representative of opioid abuse potential, such as lower peak Drug Liking in recreational opioid users, than 40 and 60 mg of oxycodone.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAnalgesics, OpioidCross-Over StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMorphinansOxycodoneRecreational Drug UseAnalgesics, OpioidMorphinansNKTR-181OxycodoneAbuse PotentialChronic PainDrug LikingNKTR-181Opioid

Identifiers

PMID31553457
PMCPMC12481195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.