Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31553066›Full record

ReviewImmunological reviews2020

The immune response to malaria in utero.

Margaret E Feeney

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunological reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Malaria prevention: advancing clinical trials to policy.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Placental Malaria.Current tropical medicine reports · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Margaret E FeeneyDepartments of Pediatrics and Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

The immunologic consequences of prenatal exposure to malariaP01HD059454 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI DORSEY, MATTHEW G · 2008 to 2017
$22.6M
The role of γδ T cells in fetal and infant immune defense against malariaR01AI093615 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FEENEY, MARGARET E · 2011 to 2025
$9.1M
Mentoring Translational Researchers for Careers in Pediatric Global HealthK24AI113002 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FEENEY, MARGARET E · 2014 to 2023
$1.9M
NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI113002NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI093615NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD059454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malaria causes tremendous early childhood morbidity and mortality, providing an urgent impetus for the development of a vaccine that is effective in neonates. However, the infant immune response to malaria may be influenced by events that occur well before birth. Placental malaria infection complicates one quarter of all pregnancies in Africa and frequently results in exposure of the fetus to malaria antigens in utero, while the immune system is still developing. Some data suggest that in utero exposure to malaria may induce immunologic tolerance that interferes with the development of protective immunity during childhood. More recently, however, a growing body of evidence suggests that fetal malaria exposure can prime highly functional malaria-specific T- and B-cells, which may contribute to postnatal protection from malaria. In utero exposure to malaria also impacts the activation and maturation of fetal antigen presenting cells and innate lymphocytes, which could have implications for global immunity in the infant. Here, we review recent advances in our understanding of how various components of the fetal immune system are altered by in utero exposure to malaria, discuss factors that may tilt the critical balance between tolerance and adaptive immunity, and consider the implications of these findings for malaria prevention strategies.

Indexed as

Immunity, Maternally-AcquiredPregnancy Complications, ParasiticAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanFemaleHost-Parasite InteractionsHumansImmune ToleranceImmunity, InnateInfantInfant, NewbornMalariaPlacentaPlasmodiumPregnancySex FactorsAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, Protozoanfetalimmune developmentplacental malariapregnancyT-cellstolerance

Identifiers

PMID31553066
PMCPMC6944753
OpenAlexW2976864520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.