Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31552911›Full record

ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound

DNA sequencing of cytopathologically inconclusive EUS-FNA from solid pancreatic lesions suspicious for malignancy confirms EUS diagnosis.

Julie Isabelle Plougmann, Pia Klausen, Anders Toxvaerd, Armita Armina Abedi, Bojan Kovacevic, John Gásdal Karstensen, Tim Svenstrup Poulsen, Evangelos Kalaitzakis, Estrid Høgdall, Peter Vilmann

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Next-Generation Sequencing: An Advanced Diagnostic Tool for Detection of Pancreatic Disease/Disorder.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julie Isabelle PlougmannDivision of Endoscopy, Gastro Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Pia KlausenDivision of Endoscopy, Gastro Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Anders ToxvaerdDepartment of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Herlev, Denmark.
Armita Armina AbediDivision of Endoscopy, Gastro Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Bojan KovacevicDivision of Endoscopy, Gastro Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
John Gásdal KarstensenDivision of Surgery, Gastro Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Tim Svenstrup PoulsenDepartment of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Herlev, Denmark.
Evangelos KalaitzakisDivision of Endoscopy, Gastro Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Estrid HøgdallDepartment of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Herlev, Denmark.
Peter VilmannDivision of Endoscopy, Gastro Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKHerlev Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesEUS-FNA is inconclusive in up to 10%-15% of patients with solid pancreatic lesions (SPLs). We aimed to investigate whether supplementary genetic analyses with whole-exome sequencing add diagnostic value in patients with SPLs suspicious of malignancy but inconclusive EUS-FNA. PATIENTS AND

methodsThirty-nine patients, who underwent EUS-FNA of an SPL were retrospectively included. Three groups were defined: 16 (41.0%) had suspected malignancy on EUS confirmed by cytology (malignant), 13 (33.3%) had suspected malignancy on EUS but benign cytology (inconclusive), and 10 (25.6%) had benign EUS imaging and cytology (benign). Areas with the highest epithelial cell concentrations were macro-dissected from the FNA smears from each patient, and extracted DNA was used for whole-exome sequencing by next-generation sequencing of a selected gene panel including 19 genes commonly mutated in cancer.

resultsPathogenic mutations in K-RAS, TP53, and PIK3CA differed significantly between the three groups (P < 0.001, P = 0.018, and P = 0.026, respectively). Pathogenic mutations in KRAS and TP53 were predominant in the inconclusive (54% and 31%, respectively) and malignant groups (81.3% and 50%, respectively) compared to the benign group (0%). Malignant and inconclusive diagnoses correlated strongly with poor overall survival (P < 0.001).

conclusionWhole-exome sequencing of genes commonly mutated in pancreatic cancer may be an important adjunct in patients with SPLs suspicious for malignancy on EUS but with uncertain cytological diagnosis.

Indexed as

DiagnosticsEUS-FNAnext-generation sequencingpancreatic ductal adenocarcinomawhole-exome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID31552911
PMCPMC7038737
OpenAlexW2974938967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.