Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31552718›Full record

ArticleAllergy, asthma & immunology research2019

Value of Exhaled Nitric Oxide and FEF

Xiaofang Liu, Xiangdong Wang, Xiujuan Yao, Yuhong Wang, Yongchang Sun, Luo Zhang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Allergy, asthma & immunology research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Phenotypes and endotypes of cough in asthma.Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaofang LiuDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4459-1343
Xiangdong WangDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0409-322X
Xiujuan YaoDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8599-6625
Yuhong WangDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2543-9429
Yongchang SunDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3281-8854
Luo ZhangDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0910-9884
Beijing Tongren Hospital · CN

Funding

Beijing Health Bureau Program for High Level Talents 2014-3-018Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals' Mission Plan SML20150203Beijing Scientific and Technological Overall Plan Z171100000117002Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team IRT13082National Natural Science Fund 81100704National Natural Science Fund 81441029National Natural Science Fund 81441031National Natural Science Fund 81570894National Natural Science Fund 81630023National Natural Science Fund for the Major International Joint Research Program 81420108009project of Application of Clinical Features in Capital City by the Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission Z131107002213135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeChronic cough in allergic rhinitis (AR) patients is common with multiple etiologies including cough variant asthma (CVA), non-asthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis (NAEB), gastroesophageal reflux-related cough (GERC), and upper airway cough syndrome (UACS). Practical indicators that distinguish these categories are lacking. We aimed to explore the diagnostic value of the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and forced expiratory flow at 25% and 75% of pulmonary volume (FEF

methodsConsecutive AR patients with chronic cough were screened and underwent induced sputum, FeNO, nasal nitric oxide, spirometry, and methacholine bronchial provocation testing. All patients also completed gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaires.

resultsAmong 1,680 AR patients, 324 (19.3%) were identified with chronic cough, of whom 316 (97.5%) underwent etiology analyses. Overall, 87 (27.5%) patients had chronic cough caused by NAEB, 78 (24.7%) by CVA, 16 (5.1%) by GERC, and 81 (25.6%) by UACS. Patients with either NAEB or CVA (n = 165, in total) were further assigned to a common group designated as CVA/NAEB, because they both responded to corticosteroid therapy. Receiver operating characteristic curves of FeNO revealed obvious differences among CVA, NAEB, and CVA/NAEB (area under the curve = 0.855, 0.699, and 0.923, respectively). The cutoff values of FeNO at 43.5 and 32.5 ppb were shown to best differentiate CVA and CVA/NAEB, respectively. FEF

conclusionsNAEB, CVA, and UACS are common causes of chronic cough in patients with AR. FeNO can first be used to discriminate patients with CVA/NAEB, then FEF

Indexed as

allergic rhinitisasthmaChronic cougheosinophilic bronchitisFEF25-75 percentFeNO

Identifiers

PMID31552718
PMCPMC6761070
OpenAlexW2973932211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.