Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31552559›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular neurobiology2020

Urokinase Plasminogen Activator: A Potential Thrombolytic Agent for Ischaemic Stroke.

Rais Reskiawan A Kadir, Ulvi Bayraktutan

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular neurobiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. PA System in the Pathogenesis of Ischemic Stroke.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Desmoteplase.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Clinical Efficacy of Xueshuantong plus Urokinase in the Treatment of Sudden Deafness.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rais Reskiawan A KadirStroke, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, Clinical Sciences Building, Hucknall Road, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK.
Ulvi BayraktutanStroke, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, School of Medicine, The University of Nottingham, Clinical Sciences Building, Hucknall Road, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK. ulvi.bayraktutan@nottingham.ac.uk.
University of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke continues to be one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Restoration of cerebral blood flow by recombinant plasminogen activator (rtPA) with or without mechanical thrombectomy is considered the most effective therapy for rescuing brain tissue from ischaemic damage, but this requires advanced facilities and highly skilled professionals, entailing high costs, thus in resource-limited contexts urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) is commonly used as an alternative. This literature review summarises the existing studies relating to the potential clinical application of uPA in ischaemic stroke patients. In translational studies of ischaemic stroke, uPA has been shown to promote nerve regeneration and reduce infarct volume and neurological deficits. Clinical trials employing uPA as a thrombolytic agent have replicated these favourable outcomes and reported consistent increases in recanalisation, functional improvement and cerebral haemorrhage rates, similar to those observed with rtPA. Single-chain zymogen pro-urokinase (pro-uPA) and rtPA appear to be complementary and synergistic in their action, suggesting that their co-administration may improve the efficacy of thrombolysis without affecting the overall risk of haemorrhage. Large clinical trials examining the efficacy of uPA or the combination of pro-uPA and rtPA are desperately required to unravel whether either therapeutic approach may be a safe first-line treatment option for patients with ischaemic stroke. In light of the existing limited data, thrombolysis with uPA appears to be a potential alternative to rtPA-mediated reperfusive treatment due to its beneficial effects on the promotion of revascularisation and nerve regeneration.

Indexed as

Fibrinolytic AgentsAnimalsBrain IschemiaHumansRecombinant ProteinsStrokeUrokinase-Type Plasminogen ActivatorFibrinolytic AgentsRecombinant ProteinssaruplaseUrokinase-Type Plasminogen ActivatorIschaemic injuryReperfusive therapyrtPAStrokeThrombolysisUrokinase plasminogen activator

Identifiers

PMID31552559
PMCPMC11448917
OpenAlexW2976672175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.