Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31552489›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2019

MicroRNAs in tumor samples and urinary extracellular vesicles as a putative diagnostic tool for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Sophie Baumgart, Pascal Meschkat, Philipp Edelmann, Joana Heinzelmann, Alexey Pryalukhin, Rainer Bohle, Julia Heinzelbecker, Michael Stöckle, Kerstin Junker

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Urinary MicroRNAs as Biomarkers of Urological Cancers: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The role of exosomes in bladder cancer immunotherapy.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Urinary podocyte markers in diabetic kidney disease.Kidney research and clinical practice · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sophie BaumgartDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Saarland University, Kirrberger Str 100, 66424, Homburg, Germany.
Pascal MeschkatDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Saarland University, Kirrberger Str 100, 66424, Homburg, Germany.
Philipp EdelmannDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Saarland University, Kirrberger Str 100, 66424, Homburg, Germany.
Joana HeinzelmannDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Saarland University, Kirrberger Str 100, 66424, Homburg, Germany.
Alexey PryalukhinInstitute of Pathology, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
Rainer BohleInstitute of Pathology, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
Julia HeinzelbeckerDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Saarland University, Kirrberger Str 100, 66424, Homburg, Germany.
Michael StöckleDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Saarland University, Kirrberger Str 100, 66424, Homburg, Germany.
Kerstin JunkerDepartment of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Saarland University, Kirrberger Str 100, 66424, Homburg, Germany. kerstin.junker@uks.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0873-8128
Saarland University · DEMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe identification of biomarkers characterizing the invasive potential of bladder cancer could enhance the clinical management of individual patients and therefore improve prognosis. The aim of this study was to define a miRNA panel in tumor tissues as well as in urinary extracellular vesicles (EVs) for discriminating muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) from non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).

methodsmiRNA expression was analyzed in 24 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor samples by microarray analysis and was further validated by qRT-PCR in 56 FFPE tumor samples as well as in 37 urinary EV samples.

resultsMicroarray analysis revealed 63 miRNAs that were significantly differentially expressed (P < 0.05) between tissues from MIBC and NMIBC tumors. Five selected miRNAs (miR-146b-5p, miR-155-5p, miR-138-5p, miR-144-5p, and miR-200a-3p) were validated by qRT-PCR. The expression of all except miR-144-5p was significantly associated with high tumor grade. In urinary EVs, a different expression was verified for miR-146b-5p (P = 0.004) and miR-155-5p (P = 0.036), which exhibited significantly higher expression in urinary EVs from patients with MIBC.

conclusionsmiRNAs are promising biomarkers for the identification of invasive bladder carcinomas. Tissue samples as well as urinary EVs may serve as sources for miRNA analysis. This method, in addition to histopathology, could provide a new diagnostic tool and facilitate individual therapeutic decisions to select patients for early cystectomy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorExtracellular VesiclesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMaleMicroRNAsMiddle AgedMuscle NeoplasmsPrognosisUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsBladder cancerExtracellular vesiclemicroRNAMuscle-invasive bladder cancerUrine

Identifiers

PMID31552489
PMCPMC11810427
OpenAlexW2977009445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.