Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31552441›Full record

ReviewDer Anaesthesist2019

[Exit wave plan for structured secondary patient distribution : Logistic concept for mass victims of terrorist attacks].

E Pfenninger, M Königsdorfer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

E PfenningerStabsstelle Katastrophenschutz, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 29, 89081, Ulm, Deutschland. ernst.pfenninger@uniklinik-ulm.de.
M KönigsdorferKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollowing a terrorist attack a second hit is to be feared. The adequate reaction of the emergency services on site is to clear the scene. Since in such cases no treatment areas are set up at the scene of the incident, the injured are quickly admitted to the nearest hospital, either by themselves or by the emergency services and are largely untreated. Therefore, the hospital has to be ready to take in a significantly larger number of injured people in a very short period of time than after a conventional mass casualty incident. Due to the conceivably large number of wounded persons the emergency department can ensure primary medical care but nowhere near all casualties admitted to the hospital can be definitively treated.

objectiveIn order to provide injured patients with individual medical care after initial treatment according to the criteria of damage control resuscitation, a concept should be developed that enables a well-organized secondary transfer to receiving hospitals with appropriate equipment. MATERIAL AND

methodsWithin a radius of 100 km from Ulm, all hospitals certified by the German Society for Trauma Surgery were contacted and asked to indicate how many emergency patients of the triage categories T1 (red), T2 (yellow) and T3 (green) could be admitted and treated around the clock (24/7). Special features such as a helicopter landing pad, neurosurgical care and pediatric traumatology care were considered.

resultsOf the 32 hospitals within a 100 km radius of Ulm 29 (91%) provided information on the admission capacity. In these hospitals 45 T1, 121 T2 and 333 T3 patients could be admitted around the clock (24/7). A helicopter landing pad is available at 26 of the 29 hospitals (90%), 11 hospitals (38%) can treat patients for emergency neurosurgery and 18 hospitals (62%) have the possibility of pediatric traumatological emergency care. Based on this information the structured exit wave plan was developed, which enables a secondary transfer of at least 100 patients to qualified trauma centers.

conclusionThe University Hospital of Ulm has made preparations to admit at least 100 injured patients for initial medical treatment following a terrorist attack. This corresponds to 10% of the hospital beds as required in the literature. Together with the neighboring Military Hospital and the University and Rehabilitation Hospital Ulm up to 300 injured patients can be treated; however, the number of available intensive care unit (ICU) beds and capacities in normal wards for definitive care is much lower, therefore, patients treated according to the principles of damage control resuscitation have to be relocated. By documenting the capacity of the hospitals within a 100 km radius around Ulm and taking their specific features into account, an exit wave plan could be created that enables patient distribution for definitive care without time-consuming procedures.

Indexed as

Mass Casualty IncidentsDisaster PlanningEmergency Service, HospitalHospitalsHumansTrauma CentersTriageEmergency service, hospitalHealth resourcesLife-threatening mission situationPatient transferSecond hit

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.