Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31552432›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2019

CDK and Mec1/Tel1-catalyzed phosphorylation of Sae2 regulate different responses to DNA damage.

Tai-Yuan Yu, Valerie E Garcia, Lorraine S Symington

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. DNA damage checkpoint execution and the rules of its disengagement.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Srs2 helicase dampens DNA damage checkpoint by recycling RPA from chromatin.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tai-Yuan YuDepartment of Microbiology & Immunology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Valerie E GarciaDepartment of Microbiology & Immunology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Lorraine S SymingtonDepartment of Microbiology & Immunology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

The Role of CTIP in Lymphocyte Development and LymphomagenesisP01CA174653 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI RABADAN, RAUL · 2014 to 2024
$17.6M
Mechanism and regulation of DNA double-strand break repairR35GM126997 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Lorraine S Symington · 2018 to 2026
$5.9M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA174653NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM126997
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sae2 functions in the DNA damage response by controlling Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 (MRX)-catalyzed end resection, an essential step for homology-dependent repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs), and by attenuating DNA damage checkpoint signaling. Phosphorylation of Sae2 by cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK1/Cdc28) activates the Mre11 endonuclease, while the physiological role of Sae2 phosphorylation by Mec1 and Tel1 checkpoint kinases is not fully understood. Here, we compare the phenotype of sae2 mutants lacking the main CDK (sae2-S267A) or Mec1 and Tel1 phosphorylation sites (sae2-5A) with sae2Δ and Mre11 nuclease defective (mre11-nd) mutants. The phosphorylation-site mutations confer DNA damage sensitivity, but not to the same extent as sae2Δ. The sae2-S267A mutation is epistatic to mre11-nd for camptothecin (CPT) sensitivity and synergizes with sgs1Δ, whereas sae2-5A synergizes with mre11-nd and exhibits epistasis with sgs1Δ. We find that attenuation of checkpoint signaling by Sae2 is mostly independent of Mre11 endonuclease activation but requires Mec1 and Tel1-dependent phosphorylation of Sae2. These results support a model whereby CDK-catalyzed phosphorylation of Sae2 activates resection via Mre11 endonuclease, whereas Sae2 phosphorylation by Mec1 and Tel1 promotes resection by the Dna2-Sgs1 and Exo1 pathways indirectly by dampening the DNA damage response.

Indexed as

CatalysisCyclin-Dependent KinasesDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA DamageDNA HelicasesEndonucleasesExodeoxyribonucleasesIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsOrganisms, Genetically ModifiedPhosphorylationProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRecQ HelicasesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSignal TransductionCyclin-Dependent KinasesDNA2 protein, S cerevisiaeDNA HelicasesEndonucleasesexodeoxyribonuclease IExodeoxyribonucleasesIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMEC1 protein, S cerevisiaeProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRecQ HelicasesSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSAE2 protein, S cerevisiaeSGS1 protein, S cerevisiaeTEL1 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID31552432
PMCPMC6868371
OpenAlexW2976838913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.