ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2019
A Random Forest Sub-Golgi Protein Classifier Optimized via Dipeptide and Amino Acid Composition Features.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accurate prediction of toxicity peptide and its function using multi-view tensor learning and latent semantic learning framework.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Article
- Identification of plant vacuole proteins by using graph neural network and contact maps.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Golgi_DF: Golgi proteins classification with deep forest.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- IGPred-HDnet: Prediction of Immunoglobulin Proteins Using Graphical Features and the Hierarchal Deep Learning-Based Approach.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2023Article
- Bitter-RF: A random forest machine model for recognizing bitter peptides.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Integrative analysis and prediction of human R-loop binding proteins.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Identify Bitter Peptides by Using Deep Representation Learning Features.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- A polygenic stacking classifier revealed the complicated platelet transcriptomic landscape of adult immune thrombocytopenia.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2022Article
- Machine learning and comparative genomics approaches for the discovery of xylose transporters in yeast.Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts · 2022Article
- Efficient Identification of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Compounds Using Chemical Structure- and Biological Activity-Based Modeling.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2022Article
- Using amino acids co-occurrence matrices and explainability model to investigate patterns in dengue virus proteins.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- ISTRF: Identification of sucrose transporter using random forest.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Article
- Identification of sub-Golgi protein localization by use of deep representation learning features.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Prediction of Metal Ion Binding Sites of Transmembrane Proteins.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2021Article
- iT3SE-PX: Identification of Bacterial Type III Secreted Effectors Using PSSM Profiles and XGBoost Feature Selection.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2021Article
- Identifying Plant Pentatricopeptide Repeat Proteins Using a Variable Selection Method.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Amino Acid Reduction Can Help to Improve the Identification of Antimicrobial Peptides and Their Functional Activities.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Identification of cyclin protein using gradient boost decision tree algorithm.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To gain insight into the malfunction of the Golgi apparatus and its relationship to various genetic and neurodegenerative diseases, the identification of sub-Golgi proteins, both cis-Golgi and trans-Golgi proteins, is of great significance. In this study, a state-of-art random forests sub-Golgi protein classifier, rfGPT, was developed. The rfGPT used 2-gap dipeptide and split amino acid composition for the feature vectors and was combined with the synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE) and an analysis of variance (ANOVA) feature selection method. The rfGPT was trained on a sub-Golgi protein sequence data set (137 sequences), with sequence identity less than 25%. For the optimal rfGPT classifier with 93 features, the accuracy (ACC) was 90.5%; the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) was 0.811; the sensitivity (Sn) was 92.6%; and the specificity (Sp) was 88.4%. The independent testing scores for the rfGPT were ACC = 90.6%; MCC = 0.696; Sn = 96.1%; and Sp = 69.2%. Although the independent testing accuracy was 4.4% lower than that for the best reported sub-Golgi classifier trained on a data set with 40% sequence identity (304 sequences), the rfGPT is currently the top sub-Golgi protein predictor utilizing feature vectors without any position-specific scoring matrix and its derivative features. Therefore, the rfGPT is a more practical tool, because no sequence alignment is required with tens of millions of protein sequences. To date, the rfGPT is the Golgi classifier with the best independent testing scores, optimized by training on smaller benchmark data sets. Feature importance analysis proves that the non-polar and aliphatic residues composition, the (aromatic residues) + (non-polar, aliphatic residues) dipeptide and aromatic residues composition between NH2-termial and COOH-terminal of protein sequences are the three top biological features for distinguishing the sub-Golgi proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.