ArticleFrontiers in genetics2019
A Novel Application of Mixed Effects Models for Reconciling Base-Pair Resolution 5-Methylcytosine and 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine Data in Neuroepigenetics.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Parkinson's disease-associated alterations in DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation in human brain.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2025Article
- Parkinson's disease-associated shifts between DNA methylation and DNA hydroxymethylation in human brain in PD-related genes, including PARK19 (DNAJC6) and PTPRN2 (IA-2β).Research square · 2024Article
- Low-dose inhalation exposure to trichloroethylene induces dopaminergic neurodegeneration in rodents.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2023Article
- Mediation effects of DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation on birth outcomes after prenatal per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) exposure in the Michigan mother-infant Pairs cohort.Clinical epigenetics · 2023Article
- Prenatal Lead (Pb) Exposure and Peripheral Blood DNA Methylation (5mC) and Hydroxymethylation (5hmC) in Mexican Adolescents from the ELEMENT Birth Cohort.Environmental health perspectives · 2021Article
- Distinguishing Active Versus Passive DNA Demethylation Using Illumina MethylationEPIC BeadChip Microarrays.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Article
- The Impact of Environmental Factors on 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine in the Brain.Current environmental health reports · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Epigenetic marks operate at multiple chromosomal levels to regulate gene expression, from direct covalent modification of DNA to three-dimensional chromosomal structure. Research has shown that 5-methylcytosine (5-mC) and its oxidized form, 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC), are stable epigenetic marks with distinct genomic distributions and separate regulatory functions. In addition, recent data indicate that 5-hmC plays a critical regulatory role in the mammalian brain, emphasizing the importance of considering this alternative DNA modification in the context of neuroepigenetics. Traditional bisulfite (BS) treatment-based methods to measure the methylome are not able to distinguish between 5-mC and 5-hmC, meaning much of the existing literature does not differentiate these two DNA modifications. Recently developed methods, including Tet-assisted bisulfite treatment and oxidative bisulfite treatment, allow for differentiation of 5-hmC and/or 5-mC levels at base-pair resolution when combined with next-generation sequencing or methylation arrays. Despite these technological advances, there remains a lack of clarity regarding the appropriate statistical methods for integration of 5-mC and 5-hmC data. As a result, it can be difficult to determine the effects of an experimental treatment on 5-mC and 5-hmC dynamics. Here, we propose a statistical approach involving mixed effects to simultaneously model paired 5-mC and 5-hmC data as repeated measures. We tested this approach using publicly available BS/oxidative bisulfite-450K array data and showed that our new approach detected far more CpG probes with paired changes in 5-mC and 5-hmC by Alzheimer's disease status (n = 14,183 probes) compared with the overlapping differential probes generated from separate models for each epigenetic mark (n = 68). Of note, all 68 of the overlapping probe IDs from the separate models were also significant in our new modeling approach, supporting the sensitivity of our new analysis method. Using the proposed approach, it will be possible to determine the effects of an experimental treatment on both 5-mC and 5-hmC at the base-pair level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.