Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31552087›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2019

Machine Learning Classifiers for Endometriosis Using Transcriptomics and Methylomics Data.

Sadia Akter, Dong Xu, Susan C Nagel, John J Bromfield, Katherine Pelch, Gilbert B Wilshire, Trupti Joshi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Endometriosis in the era of precision medicine and impact on sexual and reproductive health across the lifespan and in diverse populations.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sadia AkterInformatics Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
Dong XuInformatics Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
Susan C NagelOB/GYN and Women's Health, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, United States.
John J BromfieldOB/GYN and Women's Health, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, United States.
Katherine PelchOB/GYN and Women's Health, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, United States.
Gilbert B WilshireBoone Hospital Center, Columbia, MO, United States.
Trupti JoshiInformatics Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.

Funding

WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
Project 4: Human Endometrial Programming for Successful ImplantationP50HD055764 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GIUDICE, LINDA C · 2014 to 2022
$16.4M
Trophoblast Differentiation in In Vivo and In Vitro Fertilized EmbryosU54HD055764 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GIUDICE, LINDA C · 2007 to 2013
$11.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD055764NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD055764
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometriosis is a complex and common gynecological disorder yet a poorly understood disease affecting about 176 million women worldwide and causing significant impact on their quality of life and economic burden. Neither a definitive clinical symptom nor a minimally invasive diagnostic method is available, thus leading to an average of 4 to 11 years of diagnostic latency. Discovery of relevant biological patterns from microarray expression or next generation sequencing (NGS) data has been advanced over the last several decades by applying various machine learning tools. We performed machine learning analysis using 38 RNA-seq and 80 enrichment-based DNA methylation (MBD-seq) datasets. We experimented how well various supervised machine learning methods such as decision tree, partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLSDA), support vector machine, and random forest perform in classifying endometriosis from the control samples trained on both transcriptomics and methylomics data. The assessment was done from two different perspectives for improving classification performances: a) implication of three different normalization techniques and b) implication of differential analysis using the generalized linear model (GLM). Several candidate biomarker genes were identified by multiple machine learning experiments including

Indexed as

classificationDNA methylationendometriosismachine learningmethylomicsRNA-seqtranscriptomicstranslational bioinformatics

Identifiers

PMID31552087
PMCPMC6737999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.