Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31552038›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2019

Bee Updated: Current Knowledge on Bee Venom and Bee Envenoming Therapy.

Manuela B Pucca, Felipe A Cerni, Isadora S Oliveira, Timothy P Jenkins, Lídia Argemí, Christoffer V Sørensen, Shirin Ahmadi, José E Barbosa, Andreas H Laustsen

Open access · goldAbstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 204 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Novel antivenoms bite back.Nature biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Manuela B PuccaMedical School, Federal University of Roraima, Boa Vista, Brazil.
Felipe A CerniDepartment of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Isadora S OliveiraDepartment of Physics and Chemistry, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Timothy P JenkinsDepartment of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Lídia ArgemíDepartment of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Christoffer V SørensenDepartment of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Shirin AhmadiDepartment of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
José E BarbosaDepartment of Biochemistry and Immunology, Medical School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Andreas H LaustsenDepartment of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Technical University of Denmark · DKUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de Roraima · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Honey bees can be found all around the world and fulfill key pollination roles within their natural ecosystems, as well as in agriculture. Most species are typically docile, and most interactions between humans and bees are unproblematic, despite their ability to inject a complex venom into their victims as a defensive mechanism. Nevertheless, incidences of bee stings have been on the rise since the accidental release of Africanized bees to Brazil in 1956 and their subsequent spread across the Americas. These bee hybrids are more aggressive and are prone to attack, presenting a significant healthcare burden to the countries they have colonized. To date, treatment of such stings typically focuses on controlling potential allergic reactions, as no specific antivenoms against bee venom currently exist. Researchers have investigated the possibility of developing bee antivenoms, but this has been complicated by the very low immunogenicity of the key bee toxins, which fail to induce a strong antibody response in the immunized animals. However, with current cutting-edge technologies, such as phage display, alongside the rise of monoclonal antibody therapeutics, the development of a recombinant bee antivenom is achievable, and promising results towards this goal have been reported in recent years. Here, current knowledge on the venom biology of Africanized bees and current treatment options against bee envenoming are reviewed. Additionally, recent developments within next-generation bee antivenoms are presented and discussed.

Indexed as

BeesBee VenomsAmericasAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDisease ManagementHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHypersensitivityInsect Bites and StingsPublic Health SurveillanceBee Venomsbee allergybee antivenombee envenomingbee therapybee toxinsbee venom

Identifiers

PMID31552038
PMCPMC6743376
OpenAlexW2969745194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.