Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31552014›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2019

Serological Diagnosis of Autoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases.

Sandra Saschenbrecker, Ingolf Karl, Lars Komorowski, Christian Probst, Cornelia Dähnrich, Kai Fechner, Winfried Stöcker, Wolfgang Schlumberger

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. [Skin fragility in autoimmune blistering diseases of the skin].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Diagnostic Techniques in Autoimmune Blistering Diseases.British journal of biomedical science · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sandra SaschenbreckerInstitute for Experimental Immunology, Euroimmun AG, Lübeck, Germany.
Ingolf KarlInstitute for Experimental Immunology, Euroimmun AG, Lübeck, Germany.
Lars KomorowskiInstitute for Experimental Immunology, Euroimmun AG, Lübeck, Germany.
Christian ProbstInstitute for Experimental Immunology, Euroimmun AG, Lübeck, Germany.
Cornelia DähnrichInstitute for Experimental Immunology, Euroimmun AG, Lübeck, Germany.
Kai FechnerInstitute for Experimental Immunology, Euroimmun AG, Lübeck, Germany.
Winfried StöckerInstitute for Experimental Immunology, Euroimmun AG, Lübeck, Germany.
Wolfgang SchlumbergerInstitute for Experimental Immunology, Euroimmun AG, Lübeck, Germany.
Euroimmun Medizinische Labordiagnostika (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autoimmune bullous dermatoses (AIBD) encompass a variety of organ-specific autoimmune diseases that manifest with cutaneous and/or mucosal blisters and erosions. They are characterized by autoantibodies targeting structural proteins of the skin, which are responsible for the intercellular contact between epidermal keratinocytes and for adhesion of the basal keratinocytes to the dermis. The autoantibodies disrupt the adhesive functions, leading to splitting and blister formation. In pemphigus diseases, blisters form intraepidermally, whereas in all other disease types they occur subepidermally. Early identification of autoimmune bullous dermatoses is crucial for both treatment and prognosis, particularly as regards tumor-associated disease entities. The diagnosis is based on clinical symptoms, histopathology, direct immunofluorescence to detect antibody/complement deposits, and the determination of circulating autoantibodies. The identification of various target antigens has paved the way for the recent development of numerous specific autoantibody tests. In particular, optimized designer antigens and multiplex test formats for indirect immunofluorescence and ELISA have enhanced and refined the laboratory analysis, enabling highly efficient serodiagnosis and follow-up. This review elaborates on the current standards in the serological diagnostics for autoimmune bullous dermatoses.

Indexed as

AutoantibodiesAutoimmune DiseasesHumansSerologic TestsSkin Diseases, VesiculobullousAutoantibodiesautoantibodyautoimmune bullous dermatosisbiochipELISAindirect immunofluorescencepemphigoidpemphigusserology

Identifiers

PMID31552014
PMCPMC6736620
OpenAlexW2966593624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.