Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31551923›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2019

Epigenetics and Female Reproductive Aging.

Isaac J Chamani, David L Keefe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. A Molecular Perspective and Role of NADInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Pathomechanisms of Prenatally Programmed Adult Diseases.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Reproductive-Toxicity-Related Endpoints inJournal of developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. The Role of L-Arginine-NO System in Female Reproduction: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Isaac J ChamaniNYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
David L KeefeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With more women than ever waiting until a more advanced age to have children, there exists a newfound urgency to identify the various implications aging has on human reproduction, and understand the disrupted biological processes that result in these changes. In this review, we focus on one recent area of study: the age related epigenetic changes that have been found in female reproductive organs, and the effect these changes may contribute to reproductive outcomes.

Indexed as

agingDNAepigeneticsinfertilityreproductive

Identifiers

PMID31551923
PMCPMC6736555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.