Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31551720›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2019

Brain-Dependent Processes Fuel Pain-Induced Hemorrhage After Spinal Cord Injury.

Joshua A Reynolds, Melissa K Henwood, Joel D Turtle, Rachel E Baine, David T Johnston, James W Grau

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joshua A ReynoldsDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Melissa K HenwoodDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Joel D TurtleDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Rachel E BaineDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
David T JohnstonDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
James W GrauDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Texas A&M University · US

Funding

Nociceptive input after spinal cord injury (SCI) expands the region of secondary injury and undermines long-term recoveryR01NS104422 · NINDS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI GRAU, JAMES WILLIAM · 2018 to 2022
$1.5M
Effect of inflammation on recovery and pain after spinal cord injuryR21NS091723 · NINDS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI GRAU, JAMES WILLIAM · 2016 to 2017
$402k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS104422NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS091723NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS104422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain (nociceptive) input caudal to a spinal contusion injury can undermine long-term recovery and increase tissue loss (secondary injury). Prior work suggests that nociceptive stimulation has this effect because it fosters the breakdown of the blood-spinal cord barrier (BSCB) at the site of injury, allowing blood to infiltrate the tissue. The present study examined whether these effects impact tissue rostral and caudal to the site of injury. In addition, the study evaluated whether cutting communication with the brain, by means of a rostral transection, affects the development of hemorrhage. Eighteen hours after rats received a lower thoracic (T11-12) contusion injury, half underwent a spinal transection at T2. Noxious electrical stimulation (shock) was applied 6 h later. Cellular assays showed that, in non-transected rats, nociceptive stimulation increased hemoglobin content, activated pro-inflammatory cytokines and engaged signals related to cell death at the site of injury. These effects were not observed in transected animals. In the next experiment, the spinal transection was performed at the time of contusion injury. Nociceptive stimulation was applied 24 h later and tissue was sectioned for microscopy. In non-transected rats, nociceptive stimulation increased the area of hemorrhage and this effect was blocked by spinal transection. These findings imply that the adverse effect of noxious stimulation depends upon spared ascending fibers and the activation of rostral (brain) systems. If true, stimulation should induce less hemorrhage after a severe contusion injury that blocks transmission to the brain. To test this, rats were given a mild, moderate, or severe, injury and electrical stimulation was applied 24 h later. Histological analyses of longitudinal sections showed that nociceptive stimulation triggered less hemorrhage after a severe contusion injury. The results suggest that brain-dependent processes drive pain-induced hemorrhage after spinal cord injury (SCI).

Indexed as

caspasecytokineshemorrhagenociceptionpainspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID31551720
PMCPMC6746957
OpenAlexW2967686355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.