Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31551679›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2019

Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Rodent Models: An Overview of Technical Considerations.

Crystal M Noller, Yaakov A Levine, Timur M Urakov, Joshua P Aronson, Mark S Nash

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve ameliorates inflammation and disease activity in a rat EAE model of multiple sclerosis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. The immunomodulatory effect of oral NaHCOJournal of neuroinflammation · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Flexible IrOActa biomaterialia · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. An affordable implantable vagus nerve stimulator system for use in animal research.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2022
    Article
  19. Selective Neuromodulation of the Vagus Nerve.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Crystal M NollerThe Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States.
Yaakov A LevineSetPoint Medical Corporation, Valencia, CA, United States.
Timur M UrakovDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States.
Joshua P AronsonSection of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, United States.
Mark S NashThe Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States.
University of Miami · USAlta Bates Summit Medical Center · USDartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · USJackson Memorial Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last several decades, vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has evolved from a treatment for select neuropsychiatric disorders to one that holds promise in treating numerous inflammatory conditions. Growing interest has focused on the use of VNS for other indications, such as heart failure, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, ischemic stroke, and traumatic brain injury. As pre-clinical research often guides expansion into new clinical avenues, animal models of VNS have also increased in recent years. To advance this promising treatment, however, there are a number of experimental parameters that must be considered when planning a study, such as physiology of the vagus nerve, electrical stimulation parameters, electrode design, stimulation equipment, and microsurgical technique. In this review, we discuss these important considerations and how a combination of clinically relevant stimulation parameters can be used to achieve beneficial therapeutic results in pre-clinical studies of sub-acute to chronic VNS, and provide a practical guide for performing this work in rodent models. Finally, by integrating clinical and pre-clinical research, we present indeterminate issues as opportunities for future research.

Indexed as

electrical stimulationnerve cuff electrodeneuromodulationvagus nervevagus nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID31551679
PMCPMC6738225
OpenAlexW2968216574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.