ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2019
Trust Games and Beyond.
Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Trust learning in the repeated trust game: A meta-analytic study.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2026Pooled it
- The relationship between trust and humility: a systematic review.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Pooled it
- The Social Learning-Generosity (SL-Gen) Task: Redesigning the multi-round trust game paradigm to examine social learning and generosity sensitivity in young people.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- The emergence of trust under conditions of distrust.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The role of future planning, patience, and risk tolerance for prospective reciprocity in human adults.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Low perceived warmth of AI agents reduces trust towards them.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Trust over repeated interactions: Majority group members generalize more from interactions with non-coethnic partners.PloS one · 2026Article
- Efficiency Recalibrates Social-Emotional Trade-Offs Behind Partner Choice in Direct Reciprocity through Intention-Specific Neural Bases.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Writing with AI boosts trust-building efficiency.iScience · 2025Article
- Twin differences in the Minnesota Trust Game relate to neural mechanisms of suspiciousness.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2025Article
- Risk behind the veil of ambiguity: Decision-making under social and nonsocial sources of uncertainty.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025Article
- How facemasks shape trust in social interactions.PloS one · 2025Article
- Age-group differences in trust-related decision-making and learning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- It takes two: examining the dynamic nature of cooperative behavior in adolescents.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Intertemporal prosocial behavior: a review and research agenda.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Review
- Social and non-social categorisation in investment decisions and learning.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2023Article
- Article
- Mentalizing in an economic games context is associated with enhanced activation and connectivity in the left temporoparietal junction.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2023Article
- Trust or Distrust: The Effect of Facial Emotion and Trustworthy Behavior on Trust Decision-Making.Psychologica Belgica · 2023Article
- Does rDLPFC activity alter trust? Evidence from a tDCS study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trust is fundamental for the stability of human society. A large part of the experimental literature relies on the Trust Game as the workhorse to measure individual differences in trust and trustworthiness. In this review we highlight the difficulties and limitations of this popular paradigm, as well as the relations to alternative instruments ranging from survey measures to neurochemical manipulations and neuroimaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.