Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31551619›Full record

ArticlePersoonia2019

Re-evaluation of

M Hernández-Restrepo, J D P Bezerra, Y P Tan, N Wiederhold, P W Crous, J Guarro, J Gené

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Persoonia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Discoveries ofIMA fungus · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. The first case of subcutaneous mycosis caused byMedical mycology case reports · 2024
    Article
  6. DisseminatedClinical case reports · 2024
    Article
  7. Re-EvaluatingJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. New and Interesting Fungi. 4.Fungal systematics and evolution · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Muyocopronones A and B: azaphilones from the endophytic fungusBeilstein journal of organic chemistry · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

M Hernández-RestrepoWesterdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, P.O. Box 85167, 3508 AD Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J D P BezerraDepartamento de Micologia Prof. Chaves Batista, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Av. Prof. Moraes Rego, s/n, Centro de Biociências, Cidade Universitária, CEP: 50670-901, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Y P TanQueensland Plant Pathology Herbarium (BRIP), Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Ecosciences Precinct, 41 Boggo Road, Dutton Park, Queensland, Australia 4102.
N WiederholdFungus Testing Laboratory, Department of Pathology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
P W CrousWesterdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, P.O. Box 85167, 3508 AD Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J GuarroUnitat de Micologia, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat Rovira i Virgili and IISPV, C.P. 43201 Reus, Tarragona, Spain.
J GenéUnitat de Micologia, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat Rovira i Virgili and IISPV, C.P. 43201 Reus, Tarragona, Spain.
Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute · NLThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AscomycotaDothideomycetesfungal pathogenMuyocopronmycosesnew taxaSordariomycetes

Identifiers

PMID31551619
PMCPMC6712544
OpenAlexW2943056765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.