Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31551063›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2019

Social spider webs harbour largely consistent bacterial communities across broad spatial scales.

Carl N Keiser, Tobin J Hammer, Jonathan N Pruitt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A modified iChip forApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carl N KeiserDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Tobin J HammerDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Jonathan N PruittDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience, and Behavior, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4K1.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social animals that live in domiciles constructed from biomaterials may facilitate microbial growth. Spider webs are one of the most conspicuous biomaterials in nature, yet almost nothing is known about the potential for webs to harbour microbes, even in social spiders that live in dense, long-term aggregations. Here, we tested whether the dominant bacteria present in social spider webs vary across sampling localities and whether the more permanent retreat web harbours compositionally distinct microbes from the more ephemeral capture webs in the desert social spider,

Indexed as

SilkSpidersAnimalsBacteriaPredatory BehaviorSilkAraneaemicrobiomesilksocial spiderStegodyphus

Identifiers

PMID31551063
PMCPMC6769151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.