Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31551057›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2019

Sperm cryopreservation reduces offspring growth.

David Nusbaumer, Lucas Marques da Cunha, Claus Wedekind

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Evolutionary consequences of environmental effects on gamete performance.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Sperm cryopreservation reduces offspring growth.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David NusbaumerDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Lucas Marques da CunhaDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Claus WedekindDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
University of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sperm cryopreservation is routinely used in reproductive medicine, livestock production and wildlife management. Its effect on offspring performance is often assumed to be negligible, but this still remains to be confirmed in well-controlled within-subject experiments. We use a vertebrate model that allows us to experimentally separate parental and environmental effects to test whether sperm cryopreservation influences offspring phenotype under stress and non-stress conditions, and whether such effects are male-specific. Wild brown trout (

Indexed as

CryopreservationSemen PreservationAnimalsFemaleFertilizationHumansMaleSpermatozoaSperm MotilityTroutassisted reproductive technologyfishgood genesinfectionsperm cryopreservationvertebrate

Identifiers

PMID31551057
PMCPMC6784727
OpenAlexW2976694478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.