ArticleAnthropology & medicine2020
Patient and clinician communication practices during the DSM-5 cultural formulation interview field trial.
Article in Anthropology & medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Communication Barriers in Patient-Provider Interactions in Health Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- A different lens on diagnosis: value of the CFI in asylum seekers' psychiatric diagnostic assessment.BJPsych open · 2025Article
- Efficacy testing of the DSM-5 Cultural Formulation Interview for patients in vocational rehabilitation in Norway.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Article
- Efficacy pilot study of the DSM-5 Cultural Formulation Interview in a specialized mental healthcare inpatient unit for adolescents in Norway.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- The effect of the cultural formulation interview on therapeutic working alliance: a study protocol.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Symptom vs context: lessons learned from a large-scale implementation of the Cultural Formulation Interview.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Unlocking asylum seekers' voices: protocol of a mixed-method clinical study on the use of the cultural formulation interview with asylum seekers in Belgium.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
- Negotiating Engagement, Worthiness of Care and Cultural Identities Through Intersubjective Recognition: Migrant Patient Perspectives on the Cultural Formulation Interview in Danish Mental Healthcare.Culture, medicine and psychiatry · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cultural psychiatrists and medical anthropologists have collaborated to help clinicians screen for culture-related issues in patient explanatory models of illness and to enhance the clinical processes of engagement, diagnosis, and treatment planning. This effort prioritises patient perspectives on suffering and healing to counter the trend of symptom-based interviews which assume biologically determined models of mental disorders. The 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) includes the Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI), a semi-structured questionnaire for eliciting patient explanatory models. This paper analyses specific linguistic meanings and practices that could account for patient perceptions of improved rapport with clinicians, clinician perceptions of improving information gathering, and cultural models of health and illness during the DSM-5 field trial piloting the CFI. Twenty-seven audiotapes were analysed through the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS), a standardised method for examining medical interviews based on ethnographic studies of small-group communication. After an introduction with procedural and reassurance statements to orient communication, the CFI's open-ended questions elicited patients' opinions on interpersonal, environmental, and biomedical information. Clinicians made facilitation and activation statements for patients to speak more and informed patients about what to expect. Patients constructed cultural models of illness that weaved interpersonal, environmental, and biomedical information. Clinicians and patients made rapport-building statements to each other. A RIAS-derived patient-centred score indicates that CFI sessions addressed patient concerns. Our work offers a way to analyse the discursive construction of culture in health settings and patient-centredness through detailed examinations of linguistic meanings and practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.