Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31550879›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2019

Matching Glycosyl Donor Reactivity to Sulfonate Leaving Group Ability Permits S

Ming-Hua Zhuo, David J Wilbur, Eugene E Kwan, Clay S Bennett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Stereoselectivity of Galactosylation Reactions In Vacuo.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Stereoselective Approaches to β-Linked 2-Deoxy Sugars.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Glycosyl Sulfonates Beyond Triflates.Chemical record (New York, N.Y.) · 2021
    Review
  17. Guidelines forACS central science · 2021
    Article
  18. Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the SJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ming-Hua ZhuoDepartment of Chemistry , Tufts University , 62 Talbot Avenue , Medford , Massachusetts 02155 , United States.
David J WilburDepartment of Chemistry , Tufts University , 62 Talbot Avenue , Medford , Massachusetts 02155 , United States.
Eugene E KwanMerck & Co. Inc. , 33 Avenue Louis Pasteur , Boston , Massachusetts 02115 , United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7037-0531
Clay S BennettDepartment of Chemistry , Tufts University , 62 Talbot Avenue , Medford , Massachusetts 02155 , United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8070-4988

Funding

Reagent Control for Stereoselective Glycosylation ReactionsU01GM120414 · NIGMS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI BENNETT, CLAY SAMUEL · 2016 to 2019
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM120414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we demonstrate that highly β-selective glycosylation reactions can be achieved when the electronics of a sulfonyl chloride activator and the reactivity of a glycosyl donor hemiacetal are matched. While these reactions are compatible with the acid- and base-sensitive protecting groups that are commonly used in oligosaccharide synthesis, these protecting groups are not relied upon to control selectivity. Instead, β-selectivity arises from the stereoinversion of an α-glycosyl arylsulfonate in an S

Indexed as

Density Functional TheoryGlycosylationKineticsModels, MolecularMolecular ConformationSulfonic AcidsSulfonic Acids

Identifiers

PMID31550879
PMCPMC6814073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.