Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31550346›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2019

Extracting entities with attributes in clinical text via joint deep learning.

Xue Shi, Yingping Yi, Ying Xiong, Buzhou Tang, Qingcai Chen, Xiaolong Wang, Zongcheng Ji, Yaoyun Zhang, Hua Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xue ShiDepartment of Computer Science, Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, China.
Yingping YiDepartment of Science and Education, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Ying XiongDepartment of Computer Science, Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, China.
Buzhou TangDepartment of Computer Science, Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, China.
Qingcai ChenDepartment of Computer Science, Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, China.
Xiaolong WangDepartment of Computer Science, Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen, China.
Zongcheng JiSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Yaoyun ZhangSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Hua XuSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveExtracting clinical entities and their attributes is a fundamental task of natural language processing (NLP) in the medical domain. This task is typically recognized as 2 sequential subtasks in a pipeline, clinical entity or attribute recognition followed by entity-attribute relation extraction. One problem of pipeline methods is that errors from entity recognition are unavoidably passed to relation extraction. We propose a novel joint deep learning method to recognize clinical entities or attributes and extract entity-attribute relations simultaneously. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe proposed method integrates 2 state-of-the-art methods for named entity recognition and relation extraction, namely bidirectional long short-term memory with conditional random field and bidirectional long short-term memory, into a unified framework. In this method, relation constraints between clinical entities and attributes and weights of the 2 subtasks are also considered simultaneously. We compare the method with other related methods (ie, pipeline methods and other joint deep learning methods) on an existing English corpus from SemEval-2015 and a newly developed Chinese corpus.

resultsOur proposed method achieves the best F1 of 74.46% on entity recognition and the best F1 of 50.21% on relation extraction on the English corpus, and 89.32% and 88.13% on the Chinese corpora, respectively, which outperform the other methods on both tasks.

conclusionsThe joint deep learning-based method could improve both entity recognition and relation extraction from clinical text in both English and Chinese, indicating that the approach is promising.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNatural Language ProcessingData MiningDatasets as TopicElectronic Health RecordsHumansclinical entity-attribute relation extractionclinical entity or attribute recognitionjoint deep learning

Identifiers

PMID31550346
PMCPMC7647140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.