Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31550241›Full record

ArticleJCI insight2019

Comparative pathogenesis of Ebola virus and Reston virus infection in humanized mice.

Beatriz Escudero-Pérez, Paula Ruibal, Monika Rottstegge, Anja Lüdtke, Julia R Port, Kristin Hartmann, Sergio Gómez-Medina, Jürgen Müller-Guhl, Emily V Nelson, Susanne Krasemann and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCI insight, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Emerging microbes & infections · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Human HLA prolongs the host inflammatory response inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Beatriz Escudero-PérezBernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.
Paula RuibalBernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.
Monika RottsteggeBernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.
Anja LüdtkeBernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.
Julia R PortBernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.
Kristin HartmannInstitute for Neuropathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Sergio Gómez-MedinaBernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.
Jürgen Müller-GuhlBernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.
Emily V NelsonBernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.
Susanne KrasemannInstitute for Neuropathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Estefanía RodríguezHeinrich Pette Institute, Leibniz Institute for Experimental Virology, Hamburg, Germany.
César Muñoz-FontelaBernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.
German Center for Infection Research · DEBernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine · DELeibniz Institute of Virology (LIV) · DEUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Filoviruses of the genus Ebolavirus include 6 species with marked differences in their ability to cause disease in humans. From the highly virulent Ebola virus to the seemingly nonpathogenic Reston virus, case fatality rates can range between 0% and 90%. In order to understand the molecular basis of these differences, it is imperative to establish disease models that recapitulate human disease as faithfully as possible. Nonhuman primates (NHPs) are the gold-standard models for filovirus pathogenesis, but comparative studies are skewed by the fact that Reston virus infection can be lethal for NHPs. Here we used HLA-A2-transgenic, NOD-scid-IL-2γ receptor-knockout (NSG-A2) mice reconstituted with human hematopoiesis to compare Ebola virus and Reston virus pathogenesis in a human-like environment. While markedly less pathogenic than Ebola virus, Reston virus killed 20% of infected mice, a finding that was linked to exacerbated inflammation and viral replication in the liver. In addition, the case fatality ratios of different Ebolavirus species in humans were recapitulated in the humanized mice. Our findings point to humanized mice as a putative model to test the pathogenicity of newly discovered filoviruses, and suggest that further investigations on Reston virus pathogenesis in humans are warranted.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalEbolavirusHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaHumansMiceMice, Inbred NODMice, SCIDMucous MembraneViral LoadVirus ReplicationInfectious diseaseMouse modelsVirology

Identifiers

PMID31550241
PMCPMC6948759
OpenAlexW2976014949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.