Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31549899›Full record

Trial reportHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2020

Safety and efficacy results of simulated post-exposure prophylaxis with human immune globulin (HRIG; KEDRAB) co-administered with active vaccine in healthy subjects: a comparative phase 2/3 trial.

Mark A Matson, Eran Schenker, Michal Stein, Vladislava Zamfirova, Huy-Binh Nguyen, Garrett E Bergman

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mark A MatsonInvestigator. Prism Research, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Eran SchenkerDepartment of Medical Affairs, Kamada Ltd, Beit Kama, MP Negev, Israel.
Michal SteinDepartment of Medical Affairs, Kamada Ltd, Beit Kama, MP Negev, Israel.
Vladislava ZamfirovaDepartment of Medical Affairs, Kedrion Biopharma Inc, Fort Lee, NJ, USA.
Huy-Binh NguyenDepartment of Medical Affairs, Kedrion Biopharma Inc, Fort Lee, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0842-1796
Garrett E BergmanDepartment of Medical Affairs, Kedrion Biopharma Inc, Fort Lee, NJ, USA.
Kamada (Israel) · ILPrism Clinical Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a clinical trial to assess the safety and putative efficacy of an additional human rabies immune globulin (HRIG; KEDRAB) versus an older product (Comparator, HyperRAB S/D® [Grifols]) and determine whether HRIG interferes with development of endogenous antibodies versus Comparator, when each is given with an active rabies vaccine. This was a prospective, double-blind, single-period, non-inferiority study in which subjects were randomized (1:1) to a single dose (20 IU/kg) of HRIG or Comparator on day 0 and rabies vaccine (RabAvert® [GlaxoSmithKline]; 1 mL of ≥2.5 IU/mL) on days 0, 3, 7, 14, and 28. Anti-rabies antibodies were measured by rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test on day 14, and subjects were followed until day 185. Rabies virus neutralizing antibody (RVNA) titers ≥0.5 IU/mL were considered seroconversion putatively indicative of protection. The non-inferiority criterion was the lower limit of the 90% confidence interval (CI) >-10%, for the between-group difference in the proportion of subjects achieving RVNA ≥0.5 IU/mL. On day 14, 98.3% of 59 subjects in the HRIG group and 100% of 59 in the Comparator group had RVNA ≥0.5 IU/mL (difference between proportions - 1.8%; 90% CI, - 8.2, 3.1; non-inferiority criterion met). One subject in the HRIG group did not meet the seroconversion criteria for anti-rabies antibody, and one subject in the Comparator group showed an anamnestic response, with much higher than expected anti-rabies antibody levels at both baseline and on day 14. Thus, HRIG allows for prophylactic anti-rabies antibody titers and is non-inferior to Comparator, when administered with rabies vaccine.

Indexed as

RabiesRabies VaccinesRabies virusAntibodies, ViralHealthy VolunteersHumansPost-Exposure ProphylaxisProspective StudiesAntibodies, ViralRabies VaccinesImmunoglobulinpost-exposure prophylaxisrabiesvaccinezoonotic disease

Identifiers

PMID31549899
PMCPMC7062421
OpenAlexW2976995039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.