Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31549744›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2020

Cox regression with survival-time-dependent missing covariate values.

Yanyao Yi, Ting Ye, Menggang Yu, Jun Shao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. COADVISE: covariate adjustment with variable selection in randomized controlled trials.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yanyao YiKLATASDS-MOE, School of Statistics, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1540-1862
Ting YeDepartment of Statistics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.ORCID 0000-0001-6009-641X
Menggang YuDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.ORCID 0000-0002-7904-3155
Jun ShaoKLATASDS-MOE, School of Statistics, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6239-4258

Funding

UW COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER SUPPORTP30CA014520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Christian Capitini · 1985 to 2026
$142.6M
University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR002373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELIZABETH S BURNSIDE, Allan R. Brasier · 2017 to 2026
$75.9M
Project 4: Role of Receptor Tyrosine Kinase AXL in HNSCC Therapy ResistanceP50DE026787 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI HARARI, PAUL M · 2016 to 2020
$10.8M
National Natural Science Foundation of China 11831008NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002373NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014520NIDCR NIH HHS P50 DE026787Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute ME-1409-21219US National Science Foundation DMS-1612873US National Science Foundation DMS-1914411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysis with time-to-event data in clinical and epidemiological studies often encounters missing covariate values, and the missing at random assumption is commonly adopted, which assumes that missingness depends on the observed data, including the observed outcome which is the minimum of survival and censoring time. However, it is conceivable that in certain settings, missingness of covariate values is related to the survival time but not to the censoring time. This is especially so when covariate missingness is related to an unmeasured variable affected by the patient's illness and prognosis factors at baseline. If this is the case, then the covariate missingness is not at random as the survival time is censored, and it creates a challenge in data analysis. In this article, we propose an approach to deal with such survival-time-dependent covariate missingness based on the well known Cox proportional hazard model. Our method is based on inverse propensity weighting with the propensity estimated by nonparametric kernel regression. Our estimators are consistent and asymptotically normal, and their finite-sample performance is examined through simulation. An application to a real-data example is included for illustration.

Indexed as

Proportional Hazards ModelsBiometryCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungComputer SimulationHumansLung NeoplasmsModels, StatisticalNeoplasm StagingPropensity ScoreRegression AnalysisStatistics, NonparametricTime Factorscensoringmissing not at randomnonparametric kernel estimatorpropensity

Identifiers

PMID31549744
PMCPMC7145010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.