Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31549607›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2019

Piloting a Shared Source Water Treatment Intervention among Elementary Schools in Bangladesh.

Farzana Yeasmin, Farhana Sultana, Leanne Unicomb, Fosiul Alam Nizame, Mahbubur Rahman, Humayun Kabir, Peter J Winch, Stephen P Luby

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Farzana YeasminInternational Center for Diarrheal Diseases Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Farhana SultanaInternational Center for Diarrheal Diseases Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Leanne UnicombInternational Center for Diarrheal Diseases Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Fosiul Alam NizameInternational Center for Diarrheal Diseases Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mahbubur RahmanInternational Center for Diarrheal Diseases Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Humayun KabirInternational Center for Diarrheal Diseases Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Peter J WinchJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Stephen P LubyStanford University, Stanford, California.
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BDJohns Hopkins University · USStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hundreds of thousands of children continue to die each year from diarrhea. We piloted a low-cost liquid chlorine point-of-use (POU) water treatment among elementary school children in Bangladesh. We began the 1-month intervention in four schools (two urban and two rural) by introducing POU drinking water hardware and behavior change communication. We trained teachers to deliver sessions encouraging students to drink chlorinated water from their own small plastic bottles to avoid disease transmission. We used cue cards and flip charts as visual aids. We evaluated the acceptability, feasibility, and potential for sustainability after 1 month and after 14 months of the intervention. During 1-month follow-up, among 141 drinking events observed, 141 students (100%) drank chlorinated water. In 93 or 66% of events, students used their own bottles, and in 43 (30%) of the events, they used common cups or hands washed before drinking. During the 14-month follow-up, we observed 732 drinking events. In 653 of 732 events (89%), students drank chlorinated water; in 78 events (11%), they consumed water from untreated drinking water sources. Among those who consumed chlorinated water, 20% (131/653) used their own bottles to drink water, 72% (467/653) used common cups, and 8% (55/653) used both hands to drink water. Most stated that they drank chlorinated water because it is safe, it has health benefits, and treatment reduces germs. Introduction of specific hardware, weekly hygiene sessions, and education materials enabled schools to treat water at POU and students to consume treated water.

Indexed as

SchoolsBangladeshChlorineDisinfectantsDrinking WaterHealth BehaviorHealth PromotionHumansPilot ProjectsRural PopulationStudentsUrban PopulationWater MicrobiologyWater PurificationChlorineDisinfectantsDrinking Water

Identifiers

PMID31549607
PMCPMC6838573
OpenAlexW2975048072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.