ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2019
Alterations in Respiratory Mechanics and Neural Respiratory Drive After Restoration of Spontaneous Circulation in a Porcine Model Subjected to Different Downtimes of Cardiac Arrest.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is it Time to Upgrade Neuromonitoring in ECPR Recipients to Evaluate Cerebral Perfusion Imbalances Adequately?Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Respiratory Drive and Survival in Comatose Out-of-Hospital Post-Cardiac Arrest Patients.Open access emergency medicine : OAEM · 2025Article
- Acute Lung Injury after Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Compression depth of 30 mm has similar efficacy and fewer complications versus 50 mm during mechanical chest compression with miniaturized chest compressor in a porcine model of cardiac arrest.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021Article
- Alterations in Respiratory Mechanics and Neural Respiratory Drive After Restoration of Spontaneous Circulation in a Porcine Model Subjected to Different Downtimes of Cardiac Arrest.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The potential alterations of respiratory pathophysiology after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are relatively undefined. While untreated arrest is known to affect post-cardiopulmonary resuscitation circulation, whether it affects respiratory pathophysiology remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the post-cardiopulmonary resuscitation changes in respiratory mechanics and neural respiratory drive with varying delays (5 or 10 minutes) in the treatment of ventricular fibrillation (VF). Methods and Results Twenty-six male Yorkshire pigs were used. Anesthetized pigs weighing 38±5 kg were randomized into 3 groups (n=10 each in the VF5 and VF10 groups, with VF kept untreated for 5 and 10 minutes, respectively, and n=6 in the sham group without VF). Defibrillation was attempted after 6 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Pulse-induced contour cardiac output, respiratory mechanics, diaphragmatic electromyogram, blood gas, lung imaging, and histopathology were evaluated for 12 hours. Significantly elevated mean root mean square of diaphragmatic electromyogram, transdiaphragmatic pressure, and minute ventilation were observed, but reduced minute ventilation/mean root mean square, dynamic pulmonary compliance, and Pao
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.