Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31549477›Full record

ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2020

The pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) draft genome dissects genetic divergence between soft- and hard-seeded cultivars.

Xiang Luo, Haoxian Li, Zhikun Wu, Wen Yao, Peng Zhao, Da Cao, Haiyan Yu, Kaidi Li, Krishna Poudel, Diguang Zhao and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The genomic design of fruit metabolomes.Plant communications · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A Genome-Wide Analysis of thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Xiang LuoChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou Fruit Tree Research Institute, Zhengzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5281-9267
Haoxian LiChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou Fruit Tree Research Institute, Zhengzhou, China.
Zhikun WuState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Wen YaoNational Key Laboratory of Wheat and Maize Crop Science, College of Life Sciences, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Peng ZhaoKey Laboratory of Resource Biology and Biotechnology in Western China, Ministry of Education, College of Life Sciences, Northwest University, Xi'an, China.
Da CaoSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Haiyan YuBiomarker Technologies Corporation, Beijing, China.
Kaidi LiBiomarker Technologies Corporation, Beijing, China.
Krishna PoudelChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou Fruit Tree Research Institute, Zhengzhou, China.
Diguang ZhaoChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou Fruit Tree Research Institute, Zhengzhou, China.
Fuhong ZhangChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou Fruit Tree Research Institute, Zhengzhou, China.
Xiaocong XiaChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou Fruit Tree Research Institute, Zhengzhou, China.
Lina ChenChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou Fruit Tree Research Institute, Zhengzhou, China.
Qi WangChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou Fruit Tree Research Institute, Zhengzhou, China.
Dan JingChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou Fruit Tree Research Institute, Zhengzhou, China.
Shangyin CaoChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou Fruit Tree Research Institute, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complete and highly accurate reference genomes and gene annotations are indispensable for basic biological research and trait improvement of woody tree species. In this study, we integrated single-molecule sequencing and high-throughput chromosome conformation capture techniques to produce a high-quality and long-range contiguity chromosome-scale genome assembly of the soft-seeded pomegranate cultivar 'Tunisia'. The genome covers 320.31 Mb (scaffold N50 = 39.96 Mb; contig N50 = 4.49 Mb) and includes 33 594 protein-coding genes. We also resequenced 26 pomegranate varieties that varied regarding seed hardness. Comparative genomic analyses revealed many genetic differences between soft- and hard-seeded pomegranate varieties. A set of selective loci containing SUC8-like, SUC6, FoxO and MAPK were identified by the selective sweep analysis between hard- and soft-seeded populations. An exceptionally large selective region (26.2 Mb) was identified on chromosome 1. Our assembled pomegranate genome is more complete than other currently available genome assemblies. Our results indicate that genomic variations and selective genes may have contributed to the genetic divergence between soft- and hard-seeded pomegranate varieties.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantSeedsChromosomes, PlantGenetic VariationHardnessPomegranatedivergencegenomePunica granatum Lseedsingle-molecule technologies

Identifiers

PMID31549477
PMCPMC7061868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.