Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31549365›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2020

Strategies to improve patient-reported outcome completion rates in longitudinal studies.

Lene Kongsgaard Nielsen, Madeleine King, Sören Möller, Mary Jarden, Christen Lykkegaard Andersen, Henrik Frederiksen, Henrik Gregersen, Anja Klostergaard, Morten Saaby Steffensen, Per Trøllund Pedersen and 6 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Relationship between reasons for intermittent missing patient-reported outcomes data and missing data mechanisms.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Clinicians' perspectives on the integration of electronic patient-reported outcomes into dermatology clinics: a qualitative study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Feasibility of implementing a text-based symptom-monitoring program of endometrial, ovarian, and breast cancer patients during treatment.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Lene Kongsgaard NielsenDepartment of Haematology, Quality of Life Research Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. lene.kongsgaard.nielsen@rsyd.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2083-3870
Madeleine KingDepartment of Haematology, Quality of Life Research Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Sören MöllerOPEN, Odense Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Mary JardenDepartment of Haematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christen Lykkegaard AndersenDepartment of Haematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Henrik FrederiksenDepartment of Haematology, Quality of Life Research Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Henrik GregersenDepartment of Haematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Anja KlostergaardDepartment of Haematology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Morten Saaby SteffensenDepartment of Haematology, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Holstebro, Denmark.
Per Trøllund PedersenDepartment of Haematology, South West Jutland Hospital, Esbjerg, Denmark.
Maja HingeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark.
Mikael FrederiksenDepartment of Haematology, Hospital of Southern Jutland, Aabenraa, Denmark.
Bo Amdi JensenDepartment of Haematology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark.
Carsten HellebergDepartment of Haematology, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Anne Kærsgaard MylinDepartment of Haematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Niels AbildgaardDepartment of Haematology, Quality of Life Research Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

Funding

Kræftens Bekæmpelse R150-A10023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe quality of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data can be compromised by non-response (NR) to scheduled questionnaires, particularly if reasons for NR are related to health problems, which may lead to unintended bias. The aim was to investigate whether electronic reminders and real-time monitoring improve PRO completion rate.

methodsThe population-based study "Quality of life in Danish multiple myeloma patients" is a longitudinal, multicentre study with consecutive inclusion of treatment-demanding newly diagnosed or relapsed patients with multiple myeloma. Education of study nurses in the avoidance of NR, electronic reminders, 7-day response windows and real-time monitoring of NR were integrated in the study. Patients complete PRO assessments at study entry and at 12 follow-up time points using electronic or paper questionnaires. The effect of the electronic reminders and real-time monitoring were investigated by comparison of proportions of completed questionnaires before and after each intervention.

resultsThe first 271 included patients were analysed; of those, 249 (85%) chose electronic questionnaires. Eighty-four percent of the 1441 scheduled PRO assessments were completed within the 7-day response window and 11% after real-time monitoring, achieving a final PRO completion rate of 95%. A significant higher proportion of uncompleted questionnaires were completed after the patients had received the electronic reminder and after real-time monitoring.

conclusionsElectronic reminders and real-time monitoring contributed to a very high completion rate in the study. To increase the quality of PRO data, we propose integrating these strategies in PRO studies, however highlighting that an increase in staff resources is required for implementation.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeAdultBiasFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesHealth-related quality of lifeMissing dataMultiple myelomaPatient-reported outcomesPatient-reported outcomes completion rate

Identifiers

PMID31549365
PMCPMC6994453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.