Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31549323›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2019

Deep learning to convert unstructured CT pulmonary angiography reports into structured reports.

Adam Spandorfer, Cody Branch, Puneet Sharma, Pooyan Sahbaee, U Joseph Schoepf, James G Ravenel, John W Nance

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Adam SpandorferDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, 171 Ashley Avenue, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Cody BranchDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, 171 Ashley Avenue, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Puneet SharmaSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., 40 Liberty Boulevard, Malvern, PA, 19355, USA.
Pooyan SahbaeeSiemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., 40 Liberty Boulevard, Malvern, PA, 19355, USA.
U Joseph SchoepfDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, 171 Ashley Avenue, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
James G RavenelDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, 171 Ashley Avenue, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
John W NanceDepartment of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, 171 Ashley Avenue, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA. nanceradiology@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3775-4570

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStructured reports have been shown to improve communication between radiologists and providers. However, some radiologists are concerned about resultant decreased workflow efficiency. We tested a machine learning-based algorithm designed to convert unstructured computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) reports into structured reports.

methodsA self-supervised convolutional neural network-based algorithm was trained on a dataset of 475 manually structured CTPA reports. Labels for individual statements included "pulmonary arteries," "lungs and airways," "pleura," "mediastinum and lymph nodes," "cardiovascular," "soft tissues and bones," "upper abdomen," and "lines/tubes." The algorithm was applied to a test set of 400 unstructured CTPA reports, generating a predicted label for each statement, which was evaluated by two independent observers. Per-statement accuracy was calculated based on strict criteria (algorithm label counted as correct if the statement unequivocally contained content only related to that particular label) and a modified criteria, accounting for problematic statements, including typographical errors, statements that did not fit well into the classification scheme, statements containing content for multiple labels, etc.

resultsOf the 4,157 statements, 3,806 (91.6%) and 3,986 (95.9%) were correctly labeled by the algorithm using strict and modified criteria, respectively, while 274 (6.6%) were problematic for the manual observers to label, the majority of which (n = 173) were due to more than one section being included in one statement.

conclusionThis algorithm showed high accuracy in converting free-text findings into structured reports, which could improve communication between radiologists and clinicians without loss of productivity and provide more structured data for research/data mining applications.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputed Tomography AngiographyDeep LearningHumansMedical RecordsPulmonary ArteryRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceMachine learningNatural language processingStructured reportingTomography (x-ray, computed)

Identifiers

PMID31549323
PMCPMC6757071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.