Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31549282›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuro-oncology2019

Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for the overall survival of patients living with spinal metastases.

Xiong-Gang Yang, Jiang-Tao Feng, Feng Wang, Xin He, Hao Zhang, Li Yang, Hao-Ran Zhang, Yong-Cheng Hu

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiong-Gang YangDepartment of Bone Oncology, Tianjin Hospital, No. 406, Jiefang Southern Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, China.
Jiang-Tao FengGraduate School, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300070, China.
Feng WangGraduate School, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300070, China.
Xin HeDepartment of Bone Oncology, Tianjin Hospital, No. 406, Jiefang Southern Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, China.
Hao ZhangGraduate School, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300070, China.
Li YangGraduate School, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300070, China.
Hao-Ran ZhangGraduate School, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300070, China.
Yong-Cheng HuDepartment of Bone Oncology, Tianjin Hospital, No. 406, Jiefang Southern Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211, China. huycdoctor@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2817-7011

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe primary goal of treatment in spinal metastasis is typically to extend patients' lifespan as much as possible, and optimally to relieve the symptoms and so improve quality of life. It is crucial to avoid over- or under-treatment, according to each patient's individual situation. Thus, this study aimed to identify significant prognostic factors for patients living with metastatic spine disease, and create a new nomogram for the prediction of survival rates.

methodsData from patients who had undergone operations for spinal metastasis between 2005 and 2016 were retrieved retrospectively, and randomized into training (70%) and validation groups (30%). A selection of pre-operative factors was analyzed using univariable and multivariable COX model for the training group. A nomogram was then developed using significant predictors in multivariable analysis. Accuracy was validated using a concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve for the training and validation groups, respectively.

resultsA total of 244 participants were enrolled, including 171 in the training group and 73 in the validation group. Primary tumor, Frankel Grade, Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) and adjuvant therapy were found to be significant for predicting survival rates. A nomogram was developed by utilizing these predictors. The C-indexes for the two groups were 0.711 and 0.703 respectively. Moreover, a favorable consistency between the predicted and actual survival probabilities was demonstrated using calibration curves.

conclusionsA user-friendly nomogram model for facilitating medical procedures during clinical encounters was established to aid clinical decision making for individual patients.

Indexed as

NomogramsQuality of LifeAgedCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleNeoplasmsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSpinal NeoplasmsSurvival RateNomogramOverall survivalPrognostic factorPrognostic scoring systemSpinal metastasis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.