Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31549264›Full record

Observational studyGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2020

Developing real-world comparators for clinical trials in chemotherapy-refractory patients with gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction cancer.

Ian Chau, Dung T Le, Patrick A Ott, Beata Korytowsky, Hannah Le, T Kim Le, Ying Zhang, Teresa Sanchez, Gregory A Maglinte, Melissa Laurie and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic gastroesophageal junction cancer: a subgroup analysis from the phase 3 TAGS study.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2021
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Advances in Treatment Models of Advanced Gastric Cancer.Technology in cancer research & treatment
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ian ChauGastrointestinal and Lymphoma Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Surrey, SM2 5PT, UK. Ian.Chau@rmh.nhs.uk.
Dung T LeSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center At Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Patrick A OttDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Beata KorytowskyBristol-Myers Squibb Company, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA.
Hannah LeBristol-Myers Squibb Company, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA.
T Kim LeBristol-Myers Squibb Company, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA.
Ying ZhangBristol-Myers Squibb Company, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA.
Teresa SanchezBristol-Myers Squibb Company, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA.
Gregory A MaglinteBristol-Myers Squibb Company, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA.
Melissa LaurieBristol-Myers Squibb Company, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA.
Pranav AbrahamBristol-Myers Squibb Company, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA.
Dhiren PatelBristol-Myers Squibb Company, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA.
Tong ShangguanBristol-Myers Squibb Company, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are few third-line or later (3L+) treatment options for advanced/metastatic (adv/met) gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancers (GC/GEJC). 3L+ Nivolumab demonstrated encouraging results in Asian patients in the ATTRACTION-2 study compared with placebo (12-month survival, 26% vs 11%), and in Western patients in the single-arm CheckMate 032 study (12-month survival, 44%). This analysis aimed to establish comparator cohorts of US patients receiving routine care in real-world (RW) clinical practice.

methodsA 2-step matching process generated RW cohorts from Flatiron Health's oncology database (January 1, 2011-April 30, 2017), for comparison with each trial: (1) clinical trial eligibility criteria were applied; (2) patients were frequency-matched with trial arms for baseline variables significantly associated with survival. Median overall survival (OS) was calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis from last treatment until death.

resultsOf 742 adv/met GC/GEJC patients with at least 2 prior lines of therapy, matching generated 90 US RW ATTRACTION-2-matched patients (median OS: 3.5 months) versus 163 ATTRACTION-2 placebo patients (median OS: 4.1 months), and 100 US RW CheckMate 032-matched patients (median OS: 2.9 months) versus 42 CheckMate 032 nivolumab-treated patients (median OS: 8.5 months). Baseline characteristics were generally similar between clinical trial arms and RW-matched cohorts.

conclusionsWe successfully developed RW cohorts for comparison with data from clinical trials, with comparable baseline characteristics. Survival in US patients receiving RW care was similar to that seen in Asian patients receiving placebo in ATTRACTION-2; survival with nivolumab in CheckMate 032 appeared favorable compared with US RW clinical practice.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalClinical Trials as TopicCohort StudiesEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagogastric JunctionFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNivolumabPlacebosRetrospective StudiesAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalNivolumabPlacebosGastric cancerGastroesophageal junction cancerNivolumab

Identifiers

PMID31549264
PMCPMC6942583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.