Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31549230›Full record

ReviewWiener klinische Wochenschrift2020

What is new in the 2018 ESC guidelines for the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy?

Irene M Lang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Development of delivery plans for pregnant women with complex heart disease.International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Irene M LangDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. irene.lang@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0485-2692

Funding

Austrian Science Fund F54
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy are the most common causes of pregnancy-associated mortality.Vaginal delivery is the preferred mode of birth in the majority of pregnancies.It is recommended that patients with modified World Health Organization (mWHO) class IV risk are counselled against pregnancy.Patients carrying mWHO II-III, III, and class IV risks should undergo prepregnancy counselling by a multidisciplinary pregnancy heart team to determine a delivery plan and define postpartum care.Specific medications should not be principally withheld in pregnancy but the risk-benefit ratio should be carefully evaluated prior to administration.Beta blockers are recommended during and after pregnancy for congenital long QT syndrome and catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia.Low molecular weight heparin is the ideal substance for prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy under weekly monitoring of anti-factor Xa activity.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesPractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancy Complications, CardiovascularFemaleHumansPregnancyRisk AssessmentVenous ThromboembolismAortic diseaseCardiomyopathyPregnancy heart teamPulmonary hypertensionRisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID31549230
PMCPMC7035233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.