Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31549179›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2020

Additional assessment of Acute Cystitis Symptom Score questionnaire for patient-reported outcome measure in female patients with acute uncomplicated cystitis: part II.

J F Alidjanov, K G Naber, A Pilatz, A Radzhabov, M Zamuddinov, A Magyar, P Tenke, F M Wagenlehner

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Patient-reported outcome measures for uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women: a systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. BMJ open · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Recent research in urological infections.Nature reviews. Urology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

J F AlidjanovClinic for Urology, Pediatric Urology and Andrology, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany. dr.alidjanov@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2531-4877
K G NaberDepartment of Urology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1304-5403
A PilatzClinic for Urology, Pediatric Urology and Andrology, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8072-1841
A RadzhabovTreatment and Diagnostic Center "Olami Tib", Dushanbe, Tajikistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1948-5792
M ZamuddinovDepartment of Urology, Madadi Akbar Clinic, Dushanbe, Tajikistan.
A MagyarDepartment of Urology, Jahn Ferenc South Pest Teaching Hospital, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0299-5529
P TenkeDepartment of Urology, Jahn Ferenc South Pest Teaching Hospital, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1081-4011
F M WagenlehnerClinic for Urology, Pediatric Urology and Andrology, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2909-0797
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DEJahn Ferenc Dél-Pesti Kórház és Rendelőintézet · HUTajik Technical University named after academic M.S.Osimi · TJTechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSince symptomatic, non-antibiotic therapy has become an alternative approach to treat acute cystitis (AC) in women, suitable patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) are urgently needed. The aim of this part II of a larger non-interventional, case-control study was the additional assessment of the ACSS as a suitable PROM.

methodsData from 134 female patients with diagnosed acute uncomplicated cystitis were included in the current analysis with (1) a summary score of "Typical" domain of 6 and more; (2) at least one follow-up evaluation after the baseline visit; (3) no missing values in the ACSS questionnaire data. Six different predefined thresholds based on the scoring of the ACSS items were evaluated to define "clinical cure", also considering the draft FDA and EMA guidelines.

resultsOf the six different thresholds tested, a summary score of the five typical symptoms of 5 and lower with no symptom more than 1 (mild), without visible blood in urine, with or without including QoL issues was favoured, which partially also could be adapted to the draft FDA and EMA guidelines. The overall patient's clinical assessment ("Dynamic" domain) alone was not sensitive enough for a suitable PROM.

conclusionsScoring of the severity of symptoms is needed not only for diagnosis, but also for PROM to define "clinical cure" of any intervention, which could be combined with QoL issues. Results of the study demonstrated that the ACSS questionnaire has the potential to be used as a suitable PROM and should further be tested in prospective clinical studies.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Self EvaluationPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresSymptom AssessmentAcute DiseaseAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesCystitisFemaleHumansMiddle AgedYoung AdultACSSAcute cystitis symptom scoreCystitisGuidelinesPatient-reported outcomeUrinary tract infection

Identifiers

PMID31549179
PMCPMC7363736
OpenAlexW2975862113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.