Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31549140›Full record

ArticleAnnals of botany2020

Quantifying the contribution of bent shoots to plant photosynthesis and biomass production of flower shoots in rose (Rosa hybrida) using a functional-structural plant model.

Ningyi Zhang, Arian van Westreenen, Jochem B Evers, Niels P R Anten, Leo F M Marcelis

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of botany, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Optimizing daylily (Frontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Towards modelling emergence in plant systems.Quantitative plant biology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ningyi ZhangHorticulture and Product Physiology Group, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Arian van WestreenenHorticulture and Product Physiology Group, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Jochem B EversCentre for Crop Systems Analysis, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, 6700 AK Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Niels P R AntenCentre for Crop Systems Analysis, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, 6700 AK Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Leo F M MarcelisHorticulture and Product Physiology Group, Department of Plant Sciences, Wageningen University, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsThe success of using bent shoots in cut-rose (Rosa hybrida) production to improve flower shoot quality has been attributed to bent shoots capturing more light and thus providing more assimilates for flower shoot growth. We aimed at quantifying this contribution of photosynthesis by bent shoots to flower shoot growth.

methodsRose plants were grown with four upright flower shoots and with no, one or three bent shoots per plant. Plant architectural traits, leaf photosynthetic parameters and organ dry weight were measured. A functional-structural plant (FSP) model of rose was used to calculate photosynthesis of upright shoots and bent shoots separately, taking into account the heterogeneous canopy structure of these plants. KEY

resultsBent shoots contributed to 43-53 % of total assimilated CO2 by the plant. Plant photosynthesis increased by 73 and 117 % in plants with, respectively, one and three bent shoots compared with plants without bent shoots. Upright shoot photosynthesis was not significantly affected by the presence of bent shoots. However, upright shoot dry weight increased by 35 and 59 % in plants with, respectively, one and three bent shoots compared with plants without bent shoots. The increased upright shoot dry weight was entirely due to the contribution of extra photosynthesis by bent shoots, as this was the only source that could induce differences in upright shoot growth apart from their own photosynthesis. At least 47-51 % of the photosynthesis by bent shoots was translocated to upright shoots to support their biomass increase.

conclusionsBased on model simulations, we conclude that the positive effect of shoot bending on flower shoot growth and quality in cut-rose production system can almost entirely be attributed to assimilate supply from bent shoots. FSP modelling is a useful tool to quantify the contributions of photosynthesis by different parts of heterogeneous canopies.

Indexed as

PhotosynthesisRosaBiomassFlowersPlant LeavesPlant ShootsBent shootsbiomass allocationfunctional–structural plant modelheterogeneous canopylight absorptionphotosynthesisrose (Rosa hybrida)

Identifiers

PMID31549140
PMCPMC7489084
OpenAlexW2976306489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.