ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2019
Intrapartum monitoring using partograph at secondary level public health facilities-A cross-sectional study in Odisha, India.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a novel labour monitoring tool: Improving labour care quality in the Indian setting.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2024Article
- Utilisation of partogram at a district in the North West Province, South Africa.Health SA = SA Gesondheid · 2024Article
- Review
- Quality of perinatal care for women with high-risk pregnancies during the COVID-19 pandemic in Iran.The Journal of international medical research · 2022Article
- Article
- Situation of labour room documentation at secondary level public health facilities of Cuttack district, Odisha, India - A SWOT analysis.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2020Article
- Steering the predictors to improve the knowledge and utilization of partograph by skilled birth attendants: An intervention study.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextPartograph is a simple, effective and low-cost intrapartum monitoring tool that helps in early identification of complications if any and helps in prompt intervention to save the life of the mother and the newborn. There is limited study about its usage and challenges in plotting from India particularly Odisha.
aimTo determine the usage of partograph and explore the issues/challenges in its plotting at various levels of health facilities. SETTINGS AND
designA cross-sectional study was carried out from April to June 2018 in ten different public health facilities from two tribal districts of Odisha, India. Materials and Methods: Quantitative information from 1552 mothers using pre-tested epi-info questionnaire tool and qualitative information through 22 in-depth interviews among health care providers. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Quantitative data using Ms Excel 10 and IBM SPSS ver. 22 and qualitative data using the inductive content analysis method.
resultsPartograph plotting was found in 48.7% (adherence) while its completeness was only 1.03%. Partograph plotting was significantly better at CHCs compared to DHH and SDH (
conclusionsOn job training on partograph, regular monitoring and strict policy will improve the adherence and completeness in partograph plotting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.