Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31548918›Full record

ArticleCurrent behavioral neuroscience reports2018

Cannabis Use: Neurobiological, Behavioral, and Sex/Gender Considerations.

Anahita Bassir Nia, Claire Mann, Harsimar Kaur, Mohini Ranganathan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current behavioral neuroscience reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Perceptions of cannabis among adults aged 60 years and older in Canada: a qualitative study.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anahita Bassir NiaYale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Claire MannIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York.
Harsimar KaurYale University School of Medicine.
Mohini RanganathanYale University School of Medicine, VA Connecticut Healthcare System.
Yale University · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USVA Connecticut Healthcare System · US

Funding

Gender Related Differences in the Acute Effects of Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol in Healthy HumansR21DA038821 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI RANGANATHAN, MOHINI · 2015 to 2016
$358k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA038821
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo summarize the current literature on the effects of cannabinoids in humans and to discuss the existing literature on the sex- and gender-related differences in the effects of cannabinoids. RECENT

findingsCannabis and its constituent cannabinoids are associated with risk of addiction, cognitive deficits and mood/psychotic disorders. Preclinical and emerging clinical data suggest greater sensitivity to the effects of cannabinoids in women. SUMMARY: Cannabis is one of the most commonly used drugs with increasing rates of use. Women in particular may be at a greater risk of adverse outcomes given the previously described "telescoping effect" of substance use in women. Human data examining the sex- and gender-related differences in the effects of cannabinoids and factors underlying these differences are very limited. This represents a critical gap in the literature and needs to be systematically examined in future studies.

Indexed as

Cannabisdelta-9-tetrahydrocannabinolendocannabinoidgendersex differencesTHC

Identifiers

PMID31548918
PMCPMC6756752
OpenAlexW2899732948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.