Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31548853›Full record

ReviewEvolutionary applications2019

Recent insights into the genotype-phenotype relationship from massively parallel genetic assays.

Harry Kemble, Philippe Nghe, Olivier Tenaillon

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evolutionary applications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Genotype-phenotype modeling of light ecotypes inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Descent from a common ancestor restricts exploration of protein sequence space.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Harry KembleInfection, Antimicrobials, Modelling, Evolution, INSERM, Unité Mixte de Recherche 1137 Université Paris Diderot, Université Paris Nord Paris France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1480-5873
Philippe NgheÉcole Supérieure de Physique et de Chimie Industrielles de la Ville de Paris (ESPCI Paris), UMR CNRS-ESPCI CBI 8231 PSL Research University Paris Cedex 05 France.
Olivier TenaillonInfection, Antimicrobials, Modelling, Evolution, INSERM, Unité Mixte de Recherche 1137 Université Paris Diderot, Université Paris Nord Paris France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3796-1601

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the molecular revolution in Biology, a mechanistic understanding of the genotype-phenotype relationship became possible. Recently, advances in DNA synthesis and sequencing have enabled the development of deep mutational scanning assays, capable of scoring comprehensive libraries of genotypes for fitness and a variety of phenotypes in massively parallel fashion. The resulting empirical genotype-fitness maps pave the way to predictive models, potentially accelerating our ability to anticipate the behaviour of pathogen and cancerous cell populations from sequencing data. Besides from cellular fitness, phenotypes of direct application in industry (

Indexed as

distribution of fitness effectsepistasisfitness landscapesgenotype–phenotype mapshigh‐throughput geneticsphenotypic models

Identifiers

PMID31548853
PMCPMC6752143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.